Would the 2 year ban still apply if no games are played? If so we need to stop that appeal pronto.
Only if it was Dipperpool
Would the 2 year ban still apply if no games are played? If so we need to stop that appeal pronto.
For me the list would read:
1. United
2. Liverpool
3. Bayern
4. Real Madrid
5. Milan
6. Juventus
I have no particular antagonism towards Inter, Barca, Atletico, Napoli, Dortmund, etc.
Some football clubs will not survive the corona virus pandemic. The longer it goes on the greater the number of clubs which will not survive it and more and more the talk is not of "getting back to normal" but of having to come to terms with "a new normal". No-one knows what the consequences of this "new normal will be for our way of life and for a sport which depends on thousands of people coming together in a stadium we can't begin to imagine. Club revenues may take a very long time indeed to reach pre-pandemic levels, if they ever do. Clubs at every level are going to require owners and shareholders to put money into their club not only to maintain their status but simply to survive. UEFA's attempt to control the finances of clubs the length and breadth of Europe will stop being simply ridiculous and ignorant and will be ignorant and a dangerous existential threat, especially if it is applied inconsistently to suit the interests of a few clubs. In an extreme case, the cartel will not be threatening to break away, UEFA will be trying to persuade every other club to stay. The decision of West Ham's shareholders to put £30 million into the club is the first sign that some club owners will do what is necessary to support their club without waiting for vague details of UEFA's "relaxation of the rules" and if UEFA tries to do anything about it half the league at least will join us in court to stuff them.
Some of them just like to feel part of the gang and cling on to the idea they are big clubs - villa recently, and Everton back at the formation of the PL spring to mind.I wouldn't bet on that mate. Many english clubs will vote against their own interests in order to protect their masters, the old elite
If FFP Rules are not relaxed, owners will be perfectly free to save their own clubs but will be banned from UEFA comps for a while. So what?surely the longer this goes on, the more unreasonable it becomes in not allowing the owner of a club to use his/her own money to keep his/her own club/business afloat. How can that be wrong ? I own a club and I wont allow it to go broke , oh hang on I cant save my club thanks to UEFA FFP ! even thought I have the funds to save it !
This post nails it.surely the longer this goes on, the more unreasonable it becomes in not allowing the owner of a club to use his/her own money to keep his/her own club/business afloat. How can that be wrong ? I own a club and I wont allow it to go broke , oh hang on I cant save my club thanks to UEFA FFP ! even thought I have the funds to save it !
This post nails it.surely the longer this goes on, the more unreasonable it becomes in not allowing the owner of a club to use his/her own money to keep his/her own club/business afloat. How can that be wrong ? I own a club and I wont allow it to go broke , oh hang on I cant save my club thanks to UEFA FFP ! even thought I have the funds to save it !
CFG and MCFC both companes registered in uk. Anybody can look up the documentation which includes a full list of shareholders, directors etc.It's all about being backed by a sovereign state with untold wealth, that's not fair in the football world.
We need to show we are not.
CFG have just published their 2019 accounts and, without any external financing, showed a huge amount of cash generated just from operations. It was in excess of £150m and pretty well all of that would have been ours (i.e. City's). Not one penny introduced by ADUG or anyone else.CFG and MCFC both companes registered in uk. Anybody can look up the documentation which includes a full list of shareholders, directors etc.
Our haters and enemies ignore the facts as it is convenient for their propaganda. If their nonsense damages us, we should sue, but I guess this goes against the owners' grain.
The time of reckoning may be at hand.
The only clubs that should be allowed to invest owners money are those with large debts, the well run clubs obviously don't need the help.surely the longer this goes on, the more unreasonable it becomes in not allowing the owner of a club to use his/her own money to keep his/her own club/business afloat. How can that be wrong ? I own a club and I wont allow it to go broke , oh hang on I cant save my club thanks to UEFA FFP ! even thought I have the funds to save it !
You obviously have advance warning of UEFA's policy.The only clubs that should be allowed to invest owners money are those with large debts, the well run clubs obviously don't need the help.
Any of the G14. I particularly dislike RM and Bayern though.
That twat Ceferin has gone very quiet.
Isn't he supposed to be making some forms of statement regarding the utter worthlessness of FfP in times of crisis like these and that everyone can forget about it for the time being!
Or would that be the death of it.
Add to that later this year he's going to stand before (give evidence) to CAS about what a fabulous tool for governing owner investment it is!
The whole thing is a fucking sham.