UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
There is so much wrong with that is hilarious. PMSL.

It has found it's way on to RAWK this morning and the first response:

That's interesting as it is the type of anti competitive behaviour that could lead to a Competition and Markets Authority investigation, as well as the football related probes.

Remind me, now did the authorities bring down Capone
?

Liverpool lost out on sponsorship deals? Were they looking at tie ups with Etihad, Aabar and the Abu Dhabi tourist board? The related parties sponsors are the ones under the microscope not the deals with the likes of Nissan, Nexen Tyre, Hayes etc.

Liverpool lost out because on a sporting level they have been no where for the last decade and City have landed 3 premier league titles in this time, who’s been more marketable in the last decade City or Liverpool?
 
Liverpool's sponsor has already been fined and is subject to further investigations in to trading with Iran. They are no bastions of the honourable whatsoever.
 
Liverpool lost out on sponsorship deals? Were they looking at tie ups with Etihad, Aabar and the Abu Dhabi tourist board? The related parties sponsors are the ones under the microscope not the deals with the likes of Nissan, Nexen Tyre, Hayes etc.

Liverpool lost out because on a sporting level they have been no where for the last decade and City have landed 3 premier league titles in this time, who’s been more marketable in the last decade City or Liverpool?
sounds more like a 'newspaper' clutching at straws to come up with a way that other clubs have been negatively impacted by our 'dodgy' dealings
 
Hence the Cayman Islands account perhaps ?
If you mean City with a Cayman bank account then I'm not sure we do (don't ask me where we bank though). There was mention of a Cayman bank account in relation to the discussion of 3rd party ownership (Zucculini(sp)) in one of the leaked emails from memory but that was in relation to the company considered being set up for that purpose. Pinto also of course defrauded a Cayman bank.
 
If you mean City with a Cayman bank account then I'm not sure we do (don't ask me where we bank though). There was mention of a Cayman bank account in relation to the discussion of 3rd party ownership (Zucculini(sp)) in one of the leaked emails from memory but that was in relation to the company considered being set up for that purpose. Pinto also of course defrauded a Cayman bank.

Think he is reffering to the Amish owned rabble Trafford Rovers
 
This today from the times says it all:

‘City are expected to receive the same punishment [as chelsea] once the case against them has been completed.’

Not ‘if they are found guilty’. Not even ‘once they are found guilty’.

Literally subverts the rule of law.
 
This today from the times says it all:

‘City are expected to receive the same punishment [as chelsea] once the case against them has been completed.’

Not ‘if they are found guilty’. Not even ‘once they are found guilty’.

Literally subverts the rule of law.


Nothing wrong with that, we are fucking cheats after all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.