UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
We all know they are fanboys of the old top four clubs and a fair few are paid by owners with an agenda against our owners. The more their hypocrisy and lies are exposed the more feral they become. The goose calling the gander.
 
Wasn’t Nick Harris the one who had a profile picture of him cradling his dog who happened to have a boner.

after it was graciously pointed out by blues he’s never had a picture of himself up since

A regular Keith Lard - allegedly
 
Just checked, it was Nick Harris who had claimed to see footage of Rabin, he got called out spectacularly over this lie and deleted the tweets.

I think he might have to go to the top of the list of that group on Twitter.
 
Just a question for anybody out there who knows the answer. Of the three officials/ judges at CAS, one is nominated by city one by UEFA and one by CAS. My question is who compiles the list that the club UEFA and CAS pick from.
 
You'll have to narrow that one down a bit. There's quite a few saying that. Oh, and Migz says we're all mad on here.

It's the fact that they're not willing to engage with any of the evidence put forward to them by members of this forum that has really been noticeable. The complete ignorance of facts put to them points to bias and laziness. Stefan's blog when put to Delaney is the prime example. If Stefan is wrong, tell us why he is wrong. It's too much like hard work and unwanted work for Delaney.

In my naive youth I used to think that people who wrote for newspapers were well-informed, intelligent scholars. What we're seeing now is that they're actually, for the most part, spoilt, arrogant, out of touch, petty, vindictive, glorified gobshites with a slightly better vocabulary than a Twitter troll. Many of them just got lucky rolling into a job with more perks and better pay than people have with twice the intelligence level. They occupy the unmerited pedestal alongside politicians. Why?

Then you have David Conn who, when given the evidence, struggles with basic concepts like differentiating between ADUG and ADEC. He's turned journalism into "churnalism" and his journalistic integrity is suffering as a result.

If nothing else, this saga has exposed the visceral hatred of City. When all this is over, never forget who said what about our club.
 
It’s like a whole platoon of Donald trumps.
If you don’t like someone else’s point of view, then don’t, whatever you do, engage it with a reasoned, rational response. No... throw childish insults at it, and while you’re at it, attempt to demean the proponents with insinuations of mental problems. It works for the orange one so give it a go!
It’s quite dispiriting how quickly any vestiges of maturity and professionalism fall away from these so-called journalists when confronted with a potential argument (dispiriting but not surprising).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.