UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[chaddblue]

The CAS statement today says we are banned for the next two seasons “for which we qualify”

First I’ve heard of this? I thought we were specifically banned for the 20/21 and 21/22 seasons?

 

[BluessinceHydeRoad]

Had to laugh at the suggestion FFP for legal teams. We would end up with Hot Air and Bluster. Solictors, Co. from a shady office in Cheetham Hill or somewhere.

Yes, this whole vlog is feeble in the extreme. It proceeds from the starting point that we only have the most hazy idea of what the charge so let's see what your defence may be. Oh it's got to be on a technicality. Our "world superstar legal team" may have a clearer view than our American friend and they may have taken notice of Ferran's approach that the club must prove that the accusations are simply not true.

I have been told Pep has said he has seen the proof that City are innocent and he is convinced by it. Can anyone confirm he has made this comment?

 

[meltonblue]

The CAS statement today says we are banned for the next two seasons “for which we qualify”

First I’ve heard of this? I thought we were specifically banned for the 20/21 and 21/22 seasons?

I noticed that too.

 

[swinton blue]

The CAS statement today says we are banned for the next two seasons “for which we qualify”

First I’ve heard of this? I thought we were specifically banned for the 20/21 and 21/22 seasons?

In other words if we get found guilty the prem league will dock us points this year so we dont qualify so the ban going on 3 years

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Some thick scouse twat at it on that thread:

Fancy expecting a dipper to " do research " ?

The cnuts think they know everything there is to to know ...........................about absolutely everything !

 

[SWP's back]

Yes, this whole vlog is feeble in the extreme. It proceeds from the starting point that we only have the most hazy idea of what the charge so let's see what your defence may be. Oh it's got to be on a technicality. Our "world superstar legal team" may have a clearer view than our American friend and they may have taken notice of Ferran's approach that the club must prove that the accusations are simply not true.

I have been told Pep has said he has seen the proof that City are innocent and he is convinced by it. Can anyone confirm he has made this comment?

Yesterday in his press conference yes.

 

[George Hannah]

City were always going to fail in 2014. They hoped to be close enough to not get a heavy sanction.
The goalpost/toolkit move meant City missed by a lot more. I'm not sure why it's relevant to the current case though.

That is just outrageous rubbish. We were always going to be inside FFP limits until UEFA changed the rules in a new toolkit after our accounts were submitted and they couldn't be changed. If you can't see why that's relevant as the context for our current appeal you are a bonehead.
Ask Darren Fletcher - even he knows that.

 

[inchy14]

I thought that was the IC not the AC

I can accept that was the case in respect of the Invetsigatory Chamber whose spokesman seemed to have pre-judged the matter before he had even received City's evidence but the Adjudicatory Chamber. I cannot believe that they did not consider City's argument.

I assume because the IC hadn't accepted it the AC didn't then see it as their remit is to just award the punishment, i may be wrong here was just my assumption.

 

[chaddblue]

In other words if we get found guilty the prem league will dock us points this year so we dont qualify so the ban going on 3 years

Extra incentive to win on Sunday so we’ve got that European qualification in our back pocket

 

[George Hannah]

Sky report has just renamed the Adjudicatory Chamber as the "Independent" Chamber implying we are appealing against an independent sanction. Scum infested media wherever you look - utterly disgusting propaganda.