Bandofblues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2019
- Messages
- 705
- Team supported
- City
There is another possibility?
Bareda lied to PB about Cerefin attempting to broker a compromise?
I'm still aghast that a senior executive of ours would divulge any such info at a fan meeting.
Especially so, when we are accusing Uefa of leaking delicate info, no?
Something doesn't add up.
We obviously have precedent with Infantino, however.
I don't know, mate.
If it was just in confidence to PB, then I would argue PB would not have felt so emboldened to divulge on here?
Safety in numbers and all that?
Bareda is a very powerful figure at the club these days, which makes his admission even more perplexing.
Perhaps he was just trying to put a few minds at rest, but why go into such privileged info?
I'm not disputing PB account, only that this info sets the scene that Uefa and Cerefin are on the back foot?
It could be that Ceferin is genuinely caught in the middle, he may in fact not be privy to the details of the case but wants to broker a position that keeps a balance. As the head of UEFA he could have been seeking to find out whether City would accept a compromise and gain an understanding of what that would look like and he would have then gone to the IC/AC to see if they would cut a deal.
City however said in no uncertain terms that they will not agree another compromise. As Khaldoon said "we have taken a pinch", we aren't taking any more.
I have said it previously but one of the two parties has got this spectacularly wrong and will have serious egg on their faces at the end of this.