Saddleworth2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 21,653
Please Tolmie, if you have good news about this please spit it out. We could do with some in the current climate.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST
- Thread starter razman
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Every step you make, every breath you take...Don't run before you can walk, eh Watson?
It was every move you make, and all that...
Regardless, a visit from the boys in blue would certainly be all our Christmas' in one!!
Your original questions were:
Do the club's hierarchy actually believe we are innocent? "The allegations are not true, they are simply not true."
Are they gonna present evidence of this? They say they already have but it has not even be considered.
This contradicts your assertion that "all we've heard to date is based on technicality's and procedure."
In this post you ask why they would give us a two year ban if it (our evidence) is irrefutable. This is not a question the club can answer for you if you don't accept the explanation that they didn't consider it. UEFA's answer is that the ban and fine were for financial wrong doing and non cooperation with their investigation. They have not made their evidence (if any) public so no one can help you any further as yet. So who do you trust?
Honestly
None of them
I think we took the piss and played the game
I also think that’s because they change the rules to suit the agenda
I think we are guilty of ffp misdemeanours
But I think ffp is a disgrace
I just hope we have evidence to prove innocence rather than trying to win on procedure etc
I think we’re guilty in the court of public opinion
I want us to destroy uefa
Last edited:
Elementary, my dear Tolmie.Don't run before you can walk, eh Watson?
It was every move you make, and all that...
Regardless, a visit from the boys in blue would certainly be all our Christmas' in one!!
JRockBlues
Well-Known Member
Don't run before you can walk, eh Watson?
It was every move you make, and all that...
Regardless, a visit from the boys in blue would certainly be all our Christmas' in one!!
So a Sherlock reference and the Police. I tink I've got it. Eamonn Holmes is gonna get done by the old bill in a sting operation involving 5G phone masts.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-spying-raven-specialreport-idUKKCN1PO1A6Don't run before you can walk, eh Watson?
It was every move you make, and all that...
Regardless, a visit from the boys in blue would certainly be all our Christmas' in one!!
The platini busters been busy?
dickie davies
Well-Known Member
Without doubt the first round of accounts we submitted for FFP were an attempt to circumnavigate the regulationsHonestly
None of them
I think we took the piss and played the game
I also think that’s because they change the rules to suit the agenda
I think we are guilty of ffp misdemeanours
But I think ffp is a disgrace
I just hope we have evidence to prove innocence rather than trying to win on procedure etc
I think we’re guilty in the court of public opinion
I want us to destroy uefa
We employed the people who wrote the rules so they could find the loopholes in what they recommended to be implemented
Even the majority of journalists have said they would have had far more respect for us if we'd challenged FFPR right at the outset rather than the smoke and mirrors approach to comply
MCC
Well-Known Member
To summarise: City and UEFA have submitted their evidence to CAS. CAS have had a Trevor Peak at the documents pre-trial and told UEFA to think again?
Without doubt the first round of accounts we submitted for FFP were an attempt to circumnavigate the regulations
We employed the people who wrote the rules so they could find the loopholes in what they recommended to be implemented
Even the majority of journalists have said they would have had far more respect for us if we'd challenged FFPR right at the outset rather than the smoke and mirrors approach to comply
Early days of ffp we had Uefa looking at our accounts regularly making sure everything we did was fine and it was all fine till they changed the ffp rules to have us fail them! After that our owners new what they said face to face was utter bullshit and behind our backs they were scheming against us every turn even now with that bent twat Gill.
journolud
Well-Known Member
Without doubt the first round of accounts we submitted for FFP were an attempt to circumnavigate the regulations
We employed the people who wrote the rules so they could find the loopholes in what they recommended to be implemented
Even the majority of journalists have said they would have had far more respect for us if we'd challenged FFPR right at the outset rather than the smoke and mirrors approach to comply
Majority of journalists would slate us whatever we did, don’t believe for a minute they would respect us for a different approach
- Status
- Not open for further replies.