UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%

  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%

  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%

  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%
  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
BluessinceHydeRoad said:
Your original questions were:

Do the club's hierarchy actually believe we are innocent? "The allegations are not true, they are simply not true."

Are they gonna present evidence of this? They say they already have but it has not even be considered.

This contradicts your assertion that "all we've heard to date is based on technicality's and procedure."

In this post you ask why they would give us a two year ban if it (our evidence) is irrefutable. This is not a question the club can answer for you if you don't accept the explanation that they didn't consider it. UEFA's answer is that the ban and fine were for financial wrong doing and non cooperation with their investigation. They have not made their evidence (if any) public so no one can help you any further as yet. So who do you trust?
Click to expand...
In addition, we have heard info that all they have are the newspaper publications of stolen emails. That’s it!
 
Paladin said:
I feel like Dr Watson to @Plays By Sense Of Smell's Sherlock Holmes. So we can expect the police or some other law enforcement agency to become involved very soon?
Click to expand...

Don't run before you can walk, eh Watson?

It was every move you make, and all that...

Regardless, a visit from the boys in blue would certainly be all our Christmas' in one!!
 
I think the Police are running a
Paladin said:
I feel like Dr Watson to @Plays By Sense Of Smell's Sherlock Holmes. So we can expect the police or some other law enforcement agency to become involved very soon?
Click to expand...
I think the Police are running a sting operation that involves mentholyptus and porridge together with a packet of tunes.
Anywhere near TH.?
 
BluessinceHydeRoad said:
Your original questions were:

Do the club's hierarchy actually believe we are innocent? "The allegations are not true, they are simply not true."

Are they gonna present evidence of this? They say they already have but it has not even be considered.

This contradicts your assertion that "all we've heard to date is based on technicality's and procedure."

In this post you ask why they would give us a two year ban if it (our evidence) is irrefutable. This is not a question the club can answer for you if you don't accept the explanation that they didn't consider it. UEFA's answer is that the ban and fine were for financial wrong doing and non cooperation with their investigation. They have not made their evidence (if any) public so no one can help you any further as yet. So who do you trust?
Click to expand...

Honestly
None of them
I think we took the piss and played the game
I also think that’s because they change the rules to suit the agenda
I think we are guilty of ffp misdemeanours
But I think ffp is a disgrace
I just hope we have evidence to prove innocence rather than trying to win on procedure etc
I think we’re guilty in the court of public opinion
I want us to destroy uefa
 
Last edited:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
Don't run before you can walk, eh Watson?

It was every move you make, and all that...

Regardless, a visit from the boys in blue would certainly be all our Christmas' in one!!
Click to expand...

So a Sherlock reference and the Police. I tink I've got it. Eamonn Holmes is gonna get done by the old bill in a sting operation involving 5G phone masts.
 
Tb1981 said:
Honestly
None of them
I think we took the piss and played the game
I also think that’s because they change the rules to suit the agenda
I think we are guilty of ffp misdemeanours
But I think ffp is a disgrace
I just hope we have evidence to prove innocence rather than trying to win on procedure etc
I think we’re guilty in the court of public opinion
I want us to destroy uefa
Click to expand...
Without doubt the first round of accounts we submitted for FFP were an attempt to circumnavigate the regulations
We employed the people who wrote the rules so they could find the loopholes in what they recommended to be implemented

Even the majority of journalists have said they would have had far more respect for us if we'd challenged FFPR right at the outset rather than the smoke and mirrors approach to comply
 
dickie davies said:
Without doubt the first round of accounts we submitted for FFP were an attempt to circumnavigate the regulations
We employed the people who wrote the rules so they could find the loopholes in what they recommended to be implemented

Even the majority of journalists have said they would have had far more respect for us if we'd challenged FFPR right at the outset rather than the smoke and mirrors approach to comply
Click to expand...

Early days of ffp we had Uefa looking at our accounts regularly making sure everything we did was fine and it was all fine till they changed the ffp rules to have us fail them! After that our owners new what they said face to face was utter bullshit and behind our backs they were scheming against us every turn even now with that bent twat Gill.
 
dickie davies said:
Without doubt the first round of accounts we submitted for FFP were an attempt to circumnavigate the regulations
We employed the people who wrote the rules so they could find the loopholes in what they recommended to be implemented

Even the majority of journalists have said they would have had far more respect for us if we'd challenged FFPR right at the outset rather than the smoke and mirrors approach to comply
Click to expand...

Majority of journalists would slate us whatever we did, don’t believe for a minute they would respect us for a different approach
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top