UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
As has been said several times above, this article is 8 years old, and NYT were out of FSG several years ago.

David Gill and Rick Parry stood down at their respective clubs years ago, does that make it any less pertinent or concerning as a prior relationship between Liverpool's owners and a newspaper which was its second largest stakeholder?

Is there anybody out there who doesn't believe people such as these retain contacts and previous alliances?
 
Perhaps the fact that Liverpool’s second largest owners are the New York Times could have something to do with NYT’s interest in this matter or perhaps it’s just a coincidence!
th
 
In name no, but do you think 8 years of dialogue, ties and common interests/goals dissapeared over night?

Former members of the Bullingdon Club are still members of the Bullingdon Club. A fraternity for life.

But it doesn't exist so it can't be illegal under EU law, can it?
 
In my head I hope this all plays out where we are able to publicly out the real fuckers behind all this - the established G14 cartel and there supporters in the halls of power, who are actively trying to make European and domestic football a closed shop
And that is the bottom line with Gill behind a lot of this IMO.
 
David Gill and Rick Parry stood down at their respective clubs years ago, does that make it any less pertinent or concerning as a prior relationship between Liverpool's owners and a newspaper which was its second largest stakeholder?

Is there anybody out there who doesn't believe people such as these retain contacts and previous alliances?

The ties are there but not on paper - they swept into UEFA so that they could manipulate the powers being enforced so that it favoured what was originally known as the G-14
 
David Gill and Rick Parry stood down at their respective clubs years ago, does that make it any less pertinent or concerning as a prior relationship between Liverpool's owners and a newspaper which was its second largest stakeholder?

Is there anybody out there who doesn't believe people such as these retain contacts and previous alliances?

It's likely that they would retain contacts and alliances however if we're going to argue the toss with the ****s we should have our facts right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.