Why would we submit copies that don't match the original documents?
Human error? There was mention of contracts unsigned and dates changed, its possible someone fucked up.
Why would we submit copies that don't match the original documents?
I'm not surprised that anyone but @BobbyBoy answered, he's trolling.
Evans is a c##t of the highest order and never has anything good to write about City. Just read the article and par for the course with many of the toxic journalists he mentions money a lot and the stakes are high ( nothing new). I am praying the ban is squashed and then Evans, Harris, Ronay and all can crawl back under the same bitter rock.Tony Evans has written an article in the Independent this morning, literally wanking into his socks about the prospect of City missing out. For a guy who compares anything and everything with Liverpool, be it an earthquake where thousands have died to Hillsborough, or the BLM protests to that magical night in Istanbul (he didn't actually, but you get the drift), he's doing a great job hiding that hes a scouse ****.
Maybe someone from inside the club leaked a document giving UEFA the evidence they need without us knowing? Wasnt there an article from football is fixed that suggested we had a someone within the club, who did not have the best Interest of the club at heart? I read it on one the threads from BMThat's funny. Now you know he's just grasping. Any documents we will have provided them won't implicate ourselves!
Uefa and Evans can't say it is not about the Football Leak documents when the whole premise of reopening a case on us was due to the hack.
If Uefa want any of our docs, all they have to do is hack our systems: piss easy apparently.