B
B
BLUEMATT23
Guest
Less than 50% in the poll think City will be exonerated. Thats not exactly very confident.
Sorry meant we as In the club not this forum
Sorriano and co.
Less than 50% in the poll think City will be exonerated. Thats not exactly very confident.
We seem very confident of being exonerated, we will look a bit silly if we dont overturn it.
Cant help but think it's going to be 1 year halfway house compromise.
Feeding the media isn’t the same as us taking any action against anybody.Once its in the open it’s up to others to take any action with it or not.In what regards to not going after Liverpool if we win against UEFA ?
We are led to believe that our club has done some digging which was supposedly meant to have been drip fed into the media until the covid outbreak - why do you feel that would change ?
Even if we win we should not let those that initiated and wanted to bring us down getaway with any of it
Less than 50% in the poll think City will be exonerated. Thats not exactly very confident.
Sounds a bit like the chances of the real City turning up for any match.Less than 50% in the poll think City will be exonerated. Thats not exactly very confident.
I never said we wouldn't brief media, play the "game", be competitive etc. I said we would not be instituting legal proceedings.
All our competitors want to "bring us down". We want to bring down all our competitors. Its sport, its business. Thats life.
Of course, you are entitled to disagree. My view is as set out above.
Less than 50% in the poll think City will be exonerated. Thats not exactly very confident.
You’d describe that as a compromise, I’d call it defeat.
In what regards to not going after Liverpool if we win against UEFA ?
We are led to believe that our club has done some digging which was supposedly meant to have been drip fed into the media until the covid outbreak - why do you feel that would change ?
Even if we win we should not let those that initiated and wanted to bring us down getaway with any of it
If the hacked emails have been used, charge them with receiving/passing on stolen goods.Even if CAs come out with the verdict that we are not guilty on all charges. The damage done by UEFA and the G14 group of clubs will take a lot of undoing. The only way to do that is to take the lot of them to court. To and to sue them for either slander/libel or maybe even both. We should also charge UEFA for adding and abetting a crime namely that of hacking our system. The same would apply to Der Spiegel. As the offence happen in the United Kingdom the laws of this country should apply.
The board should start now to issue summons to the full board of Der Spiegel + it's owners of the impending trial. At once, the moment CAS find us not guilty on all charges. That we will be seeking substantial damages + costs. It has to be substantial to put of any other newspapers or journos from printing something that they know is far from true. Any decent journo/s should not be printing anything without a proper investigation.