No ibble obble mate.So the CAS arbitration panel are playing sis-pap-brick to reach a verdict. Have I got that right?
No ibble obble mate.So the CAS arbitration panel are playing sis-pap-brick to reach a verdict. Have I got that right?
Jesus pages & pages all about what we're called.
Like (Glasgow) Rangers & Celtic, we're known just as City.
Can we please get back to talking about no info on the CAS case now.
Spangles!We need a thread about growing up in the 60's and 70's.......Penny arrow bars, fruit salads, clackers, chopper bikes, penny round collars, Robinson Crusoe and Banana Splits on the telly....I'll let others go on now!
And for dinner City sent all parties complimentary Chip Barms and a tub of gravy to dip them inSo the CAS arbitration panel are playing sis-pap-brick to reach a verdict. Have I got that right?
Our owner is not a state ffsIt was claimed earlier in the thread that Etihad may have front loaded payments to suit City's cash flow requirements and it was stated it would make no difference at what stage the money was paid once it was the right amount within the contract period. That isn't really compatible with a struggling business that needs propping up by the state. Bringing forward financial obligations wouldn't be considered normal, especially to an unrelated party.
Flashing Blade
Once the verdict is passed down, whatever it is, is that it or are we under the cosh for the next 5 years whereby they can revisit it?? Also, unless it’s a fine only (for lack of cooperation), but covered under a non-disclosure no guilt result, surely we will be in the PL crosshairs for sanctions, egged on of course by the hateful 8...
Spangles!