Thaksinssoldier
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 10,100
No we need to be there to boo!
How's that worked out so far?
No we need to be there to boo!
Ooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh get you.I didn't say it would did I? It just appears timed to cloud the good things we are doing. You may want to watch your aggressive approach when you reply to posters you don't agree with as well.
Ooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh get you.
So had the statement appeared in July you would have OK with that ?
Previously we conducted our business with uefa in private. For some reason uefa or at least one of its lower chamber members prefer to use the media to leak the general feelings of its members.Why? What do you think will happen? UEFA ban City, City appeal to CAS, and may get it overturned. May. And even if we do, UEFA can say well we tried our best to deal with them, because the media have already set the narrative. "We are powerful cheats"
City fans this is not football. This is politics where the Arab has been demonised. They do what they want, and don't expect justice from anyone.
It's about time that UEFA were put under the spotlight by the media for the way they abuse the rules, but the story the media want to tell is about rich cheating Arabs.
This.
From City.
Unresolved matters, meaning?
*and there remain significant unresolved matters raised by Manchester City FC as part of what the Club *has found to be a wholly unsatisfactory, curtailed, and hostile process*
Everyone.
Can we start booing again next season?