Oi I fucking heard thatIf it was possible to have the choice of either UEFA's punishment or a reincarnated Peter Swales coming back for another 20 years of dictatorial control of our club then I'd go for UEFA. That would be bad enough but we could still work our way back from that one. There would be no more get-outs with Swales here again.
We won’t have a choice if that’s the result. Don’t think it will be though.Were not accepting a 1 year ban half way house
If it was possible to have the choice of either UEFA's punishment or a reincarnated Peter Swales coming back for another 20 years of dictatorial control of our club then I'd go for UEFA. That would be bad enough but we could still work our way back from that one. There would be no more get-outs with Swales here again.
I was thinking after the draw, emails might be sent. It's only UEFA who want to delay it anyway.Think the club will find out Friday tbh, doubt CAS would drop the news during the weekend.
If we are banned, we are banned, doesn't matter if we are defending Champions or the worst team in the world , the clue is in the term "we are banned". Hope this clears things up.Sorry if this has been asked and answered already, it's a busy thread!
Let's assume City get a 1 year ban....... but then win this years Champs League in August (fingers crossed).
Would we not have the right to be allowed in next year as defending champions - who qualify by right I think - and then Liverpool + those down to fifth can also be in it e.g. Liverpool, Chelsea, Leicester, Man Utd (whom UEFA really want back in).
Can a country have 5 teams in it if one is the defending Champions?
What utter rubbish
What brings you to this conclusion?
Mate. I’m not sure why I’m being abused. Lol. I want nothing more than this being shoved up uefa and the cartels ass.What utter rubbish
What brings you to this conclusion?