Gordyola
Well-Known Member
This alleged payment to Etihad was from a reference in one of the stolen e-mails that “HH” Would Pay a sum to Etihad It’s been assumed by some that HH was Sheikh Mansour. People will knowledge of the UAE said that HH would only every be used to refer to President of Abu Dhabi Khalifa bin Zayed Al NahyanA query from Len 'the non conformist of Neasden' Rum.
If Sheikh Mansour is deemed not to be a related party to Etihad then under FFP he cannot provide funds to Etihad for them to subsequently sponsor City?
So such a practice would be against FFP rules but the problem for UEFA is proving it?