Great read that. Certainly shows why FFP coverage is so headline-grabbing and dull at the same time. The meat on the bone is overlooked.
Money above all. “Money scores goals,” as the German saying goes.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/...aks-is-exposing-corruption-in-european-soccer
Much is stating the obvious but it has more journalistic wash and backing than anything on a British tablois these days. Sam Knight doesn't do too bad.
“Between clubs, it’s not only that we don’t trust each other,” a director of a top European club told me. “We betray each other constantly.”
Certainly covers third party onership, the original Footy Leaks, Ronaldo's mispleasures of late, priestly refs...
However, I read the author's next article and it wasn't as deep. It did feature sentence rarely seen in UK papers.
Since the summer of 2017, Liverpool, the underdogs, have paid more than four hundred million dollars in transfer fees to acquire new players.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/lett...ccer-is-damned-and-thrilling-at-the-same-time
I agree with Sam Knight and Pinto's conclusion. I think no matter what happens with UEFA, FFP and backtracked investigations, football needs to see rules and reforms in action. Otherwise, a European Super League will happen - or the Cash League will close for new nominations.
He is convinced that the game is in a bubble, after which it will be reformed by strict spending rules and other changes to make it more competitive.
Alexander Čeferin,
“Football is the only European product which is the best in the world in its field by some distance,” he told Der Speigel.
Yes. It sells papers and fuels debate.