Manchester1894
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 6,503
I would say don't fall for the same sensationalist headlines that got us. PSG's head has said he's already cleared previous charges and this is a technical charge.
Hope you don't mind but I just asked Rabin on Twitter the same questions. Ed Woodward, Edwin Van Der Sar and K-H Rumennigge are all on the ECA Executive Board.
I’ve decided to appeal against the scoreline.
Ooh, a nice bit of lexical whiff-whaff to help pass the day.I beg to differ. 'Serendipitous' suggests that the outcome is somehow pleasing while 'coincidence' contains no such implication. Therefore, IMO they can legitimately be used together with the former adding to the latter to convey that the coincidence in question is a happy one.
You are Simon Jordan and I claim my prize
I might have to call you as an expert witness!Ooh, a nice bit of lexical whiff-whaff to help pass the day.
The second one's gone to VAR! ;)
I hear Simon Jordan’s not best chuffed either ;-)Ha, ha! That's one of the most hurtful things anyone's ever said to me! ;)
I still remember the bad time Wolfsburg gave us when pursuing KDB I think they have massive links with VW.
I seem to remember shortly after VW were exposed for software violations when testing car exhaust content.
Simon Cliff - not a City employee one of our lawyers. We should sue him.When a previous member of the IC died, an internal City mail said "One down, five to go". Was in der spiegel leaks story. Not good by us, but hey ho.
Yeah. That ticked me off more than anything else.
Not all coincidences are happy ones‘Serendipitous coincidence’ is tautological :-)
If City made "observations" (they would have been asked for their submissions), the AC considered them. This "didn't even consider them" thing is not correct.
But all serendipities are coincidences!Not all coincidences are happy ones
Hopefully they will be gorging into a fucking massive piece of humble pie in the not too distant future.Football really is eating itself at the moment.
So FIFA only wanted the charge relation to Valcke Pursuing ?? And came to an Amicable agreement regarding other Bribery charges ? I’m assuming this is because they are protecting certain individuals who aren’t already found guilty of corruption .