Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
The reason it’s 2 seasons is so it gets reduced to 1 which is what they wanted in the first place.
No AC Milan appealed then accepted a one year ban.
What are his views on harbouring Nazi gold and laundering international drug cartel money?No they aren’t and have no intention of joining their head honcho said any country think of do so must be mad
Colin bell 3rd tier mate block 327
Well, according to the Times, City's owners care who leaked it because they believe the club has been targeted by agents of Qatar with the Pinto data hack and also that Qatari influence has infected any decisions made by UEFA. The fact that UEFA took no action against PSG whose FFP breach was much worse than ours is crucial to the whole case. The result of this legal battle will impact on the whole future of football and is more important than the content of the leaks. That's why City are not co-operating with UEFA. We want to take them on.
I think one point we should bring up is how PSG were allowed to get away with over-valued sponsorship (over double ours), even though UEFA's own audit said it was 95% over-valued!
Also think we should be investigating why the email hacker targetted us... and who was behind that!
We all want justice, but I want revenge... I hope City bring the whole house of cards down... UEFA, G14 clubs... the lot - and when the dust settles, I hope they set our lawyers on certain cnuts within the press.
Well, according to the Times, City's owners care who leaked it because they believe the club has been targeted by agents of Qatar with the Pinto data hack and also that Qatari influence has infected any decisions made by UEFA. The fact that UEFA took no action against PSG whose FFP breach was much worse than ours is crucial to the whole case. The result of this legal battle will impact on the whole future of football and is more important than the content of the leaks. That's why City are not co-operating with UEFA. We want to take them on.
This may be UEFA shooting themselves in the foot, especially if it can also be proved that Ceferin offered us a fine in full settlement. I doubt that CAS would look too kindly on what could be seen as a purely vindictive increase in sanction.The reason it’s 2 seasons is so it gets reduced to 1 which is what they wanted in the first place.
It wasn't. It was the very last point in time they could take action and they broke ALL their rules to do so.The five year period was up when Uefa made the claim so thrown out
It wasn't. It was the very last point in time they could take action and they broke ALL their rules to do so.
Investing my money on my business is not a crime.
City should just sue the financial unfair play rule.
A bit harsh on the secretaryCeferin will be claiming the dog ate it.
Impossible to keep up with this thread so sorry if this has been referred to previously...
A few tweets by one of the most prominent lawyers in the UK over the last 30 years...
Impossible to keep up with this thread so sorry if this has been referred to previously...
A few tweets by one of the most prominent lawyers in the UK over the last 30 years...
We've had a flood warning here this morning. Must be that jizz.Nothing like collective jizz to liven up the day.