nmc
Well-Known Member
Our owner can pay our legal fees,there is no law against that if needs be
I’m hoping UEFA will end up paying our fees.
Our owner can pay our legal fees,there is no law against that if needs be
Cuz Der Spiegel has put their narrative about the Leaks. They didn't simply publish the Leaks (or hacks) for what they are. They also put their own interpretation. Like City Sheik cheated and illegally injected 2 billions into the club. Why don't we see something like Agnelli has injected X hundred of billions with his own sponsorship of Juve ? Or Bayern stakeholders has injected X billions in Bayern between Audi, Adidas and Alliance. The only two clubs that have had that spin are City and PSG, period.
Where are the investigations for their related party contract ? Never heard of one. As if it is deemed fair just because those clubs wouldn't dare to do something funny.
They can't even realize that 8 M is not a realistic contract for shirt + naming rights of a leading club in PL and Europe because their bias is too big. If 8 M is the fair value, then a lot of clubs in Europe are in danger of flouting the rules with inflated deals.
Any chance of a podcast with Conn and PB? Would Conn have the balls to do it?
Yet he knows with the info today, that the executive council of Abu Dhabi gave the money to Etihad to cover their commitment to City and not the Sheik, but he still continues to peddle his anti City agenda...………...City fan my arse
that's my worry about all this, surely it would be easy to prove that the money came from the Exec Council and we would be cleared, why or how wasn't that done. We can now only challenge on the processes not the facts about where the money came from - that has been decided by UEFA.
I’ve seen this said on here, where has this come from?
Surely we’re challenging the process and the facts, makes no sense otherwise.
that's my worry about all this, surely it would be easy to prove that the money came from the Exec Council and we would be cleared, why or how wasn't that done. We can now only challenge on the processes not the facts about where the money came from - that has been decided by UEFA.
Regarding the reporting it’s a sad state of affairs from what I’ve read only Prestwich Blue has done real research on the charges. I don’t know the guy and if he’s an actual journalist or just a passionate blue but he’s done a lot of due diligence and research.
Fast forward to the newspapers and it’s Pep out, Kev will quit, Sterling to Madrid and the normal bollocks. It’s pathetic these guys call themselves reporters. Sports reporting is on its ass in this country, it’s just rubbish and lies.
That scouse fan Jonathan Liew opinion article on this today in the gaurdian is something special.
Starts the piece listing all the terrible things UAE has done defying the UN, arresting dissenters etc.
Then equate our appeal as part of the same militralistic strategy of the emerati government.
Probably one of the most ill informed slatned bias pieces of nonsense written on this while afair
Dan Roan. He is more balanced than usual but still claims we are state owned. When you can’t even get the basics correct what hope is there.A very good read here supportive of our chances of success:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/51528427
That scouse fan Jonathan Liew opinion article on this today in the gaurdian is something special.
Starts the piece listing all the terrible things UAE has done defying the UN, arresting dissenters etc.
Then equate our appeal as part of the same militaristic strategy of the emerati government.
Probably one of the most ill-informed, slanted bias pieces of nonsense written on this whole affair.
This an extract from that pathetic article. What a vile bigot
"
Trawl the City messageboards in the wake of Uefa’s decision to ban the club from the Champions League for two seasons, and it won’t take you long to stumble across the rhetoric of scorched earth: of traitors and revolutionaries, violence and purgation, shady cartels and subhuman scum. "
You know he's not calling us subhuman scum right? Hes saying that we are calling others that... still i think its all click bait bollocks, and we shouldn't read this shite.This an extract from that pathetic article. What a vile bigot
"
Trawl the City messageboards in the wake of Uefa’s decision to ban the club from the Champions League for two seasons, and it won’t take you long to stumble across the rhetoric of scorched earth: of traitors and revolutionaries, violence and purgation, shady cartels and subhuman scum. "
How the fuck can he write that when he has also referred yesterday to the material that @Prestwich_Blue posted on here which clearly shows the Etihad sponsorship money coming from Ehad and the EC. I was criticised for being critical of our PR department the other day but here is an example where they should be all over Conn and the Guardian. They are publishing what they know to be a lie and should be getting a serious shoeing.David Conn on the guardian football weekly podcast after taking his magic mushrooms:
Manchester City have NOT been given this penalty because they breached FFP rules in the sense they made too much of a loss or their finances weren't what they should have bee, which obviously is what FFP is all about trying to make clubs live within their means and not make too much of a loss, but this is not what City have been found guilty.......
The issue is they were deceitful and not truthful when they said it was Etihad and not Sheikh Mansour the owner who was clearly paying £57mil.
It was a breach of trust which is always a worse offence than the offence itself...an example (but not a direct paralllel) is it is an offence if you get pulled for speeding you get 3 points on your licence and you might get a fine..but if you lie and you were driving the car when in fact your partner was driving the car well that becomes a very serious offence and you go to prison...so City are not being done for a breach of FFP they are being for a serious breach of trust"
Liew's language is predictable; the use of "subhuman scum" with regard to our fanbase is designed to provoke a violent response. He wants to see a journalist get hurt at a football match (as long as it's not him, obviously).This an extract from that pathetic article. What a vile bigot
"
Trawl the City messageboards in the wake of Uefa’s decision to ban the club from the Champions League for two seasons, and it won’t take you long to stumble across the rhetoric of scorched earth: of traitors and revolutionaries, violence and purgation, shady cartels and subhuman scum. "