UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
CAS list totally diff to UEFA.
If we appeal on the substance, CAS has the power to set the "verdict" aside..
How do you know the document in our defence remains unopened?

That's a good point, I don't. I only know (read) it wasn't opened during the hearing.
 
Rich Arabs bending the beautiful game getting caught bang to rights is how most will see it. We'll be next on their list. I am talking about perceptions here not reality.
The press might see it that way (but will be wary of seeming racist), but our lawyers can be relied upon to gently hint at wider corruption in UEFA.
 
So what you’re saying is, it can’t be completely dismissed?
It was designed for internal consumption and a reminder to the wider football world that we think this is political and not technical. I think a few City fans need reminding that it is political and as such a resolution is more difficult than a straightforward legal argument.
 
Is it coincidence that its come out now, from UEFA trying to show that 1 of the nuevo rich clubs is bent so the other must be or is this UAE striking a bow against Qatar just when we need it as a warning that it's not just about UEFA & football.

My hunch is that it's coincidence.

Swiss Law probably acts in its own time.
 
The press might see it that way (but will be wary of seeming racist), but our lawyers can be relied upon to gently hint at wider corruption in UEFA.
It does not directly impact on the specifics of the case does it other than make a general point about the influence of power and lobbying in football.
 
Rich Arabs bending the beautiful game getting caught bang to rights is how most will see it. We'll be next on their list. I am talking about perceptions here not reality.

Spot on. As Khaldoon in his previously interview rightly stated - we are nearly 100% of the time clubbed together with PSG due to the ethnicity of our club owners.
 
I think this is quite a huge deal. A UEFA executive member being charged with criminal
Offences ?? If you look at Rob Harris’s tweets on this then


An amicable partial agreement ? Reaaaaally . Can we claim as a Unit that Uefa are clean and impartial with these corruption charges coming to light ?

fuck off. If he’s going to do all that for country then what is he prepared to do for club

cant someone put this in simple terms please !! if I am right UEFA wanted the charges dropped but the authorities have ignored UEFA and nicked him ?
 
This is huge news imo! Get CAS with this info and ours done and dusted and go and get these corrupt fuckers once and for all!!! Go all the way please khaldoon with this and bury FFP once and for all!!

wish it were that simple mate :)
 
CAS list totally diff to UEFA.
If we appeal on the substance, CAS has the power to set the "verdict" aside..
How do you know the document in our defence remains unopened?


but BlueSte41 was referring to a question of why the AC didn't dismiss the IC findings.

https://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/uefaorg/Clublicensing/02/60/83/59/2608359_DOWNLOAD.pdf

And probably meant that as stated in Article 16.3 The adjudicatory chamber only reviews decisions of the CFCB chief investigator with regard to the existence of a manifest error of assessment.

under Article 23 the AC does have the right to ask for and use additional evidence but until its all published the masses will never know if they opened the dossier of not, although the inference is that only 1 hearing took place to hear the investigating IC presentation.
 
This is huge news imo! Get CAS with this info and ours done and dusted and go and get these corrupt fuckers once and for all!!! Go all the way please khaldoon with this and bury FFP once and for all!!
How is it relevant? The argument is about whether Football Leaks (and any additional evidence we don't know about) show that City broke the FFP rules. There's an argument about the process. Obliquely it can be used but I think your grasping at straws. A panel of judges will want evidence that has a direct bearing on our hearing at UEFA and the allegations made by Football Leaks.
 
Those elite clubs you speak of will follow the money. That is the bottom line.

If a separate league means less revenue then they will stand by UEFA.

but there will be more money in a european super league and with the internet the major players like netflix amazon and youtube and pay per view ? clubs would be printing there own money

i think uefa is on its last legs anyway and the elite want a big slice of the pie in tv revenue and talk of a super league is not far away
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top