Ah ok, yes I did know about that. It doesn’t prove it. It’s a bit of a red herring tbh.
It does prove it beyond sensible amounts of doubt. It's an internal document from after the fact stating the sponsorship was covered by the Executive Council.
Ah ok, yes I did know about that. It doesn’t prove it. It’s a bit of a red herring tbh.
I have always turned to morrissey in dark times I must admit
Could you expand on what you mean by ‘thrown out at cas1’?
Let me put this in a better way. It seems my recent idea that tact and politeness is overrated is yet again bearing fruit.
You don't know what you're talking about, you don't understand the situation and your reading of the post is at best off base and at worst stupid.
Alright pudding?
Isn't that Marvin?Thanks PB, you have the brain the size of a small planet
It does prove it beyond sensible amounts of doubt. It's an internal document from after the fact stating the sponsorship was covered by the Executive Council.
I am probably wrong there to be honest but as in if the allegations from UEFA were that insubstantial CAS would’ve told them to bugger off
It’s strange times and I don’t know if we should laugh or cry only City could become really good but still have have this huge negativity about us. Posters bravely put on this facade about not caring about other people’s opnions but huge threads develop about media and institutional bias against us. We win pretty much every domestic trophy going for 2 years and we can still not get due credit. We are swimming against a tsunami my fellow blues
CAS have followed there protocol.
It’s an appeals process, after conclusion of any investigation.
Yeh you are right. But if the evidence is indeed that insubstantial as PB is suggesting I fully expect this case to be thrown out by April.