UEFA FFP investigation into 2014 filings - Case Hearing reportedly this week (Guardian)- Pg. 1038

Discussion in 'Bluemoon forum' started by razman, 7 Mar 2019.

  1. MillionMilesAway

    MillionMilesAway

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2015
    Messages:
    9,189
    Location:
    London
    Yes. CAS is the last resort, and that would include appealling UEFA's decision within UEFA first (as I see it).

    It was reported almost immediately after filing (possibly David Conn) that it couldn't work.

    Whether it was making sure the question had been asked, or whether it was just a warning shot across UEFA bows, or something else, is unknown.
     
  2. razman

    razman

    Joined:
    23 Jun 2013
    Messages:
    9,390
  3. MillionMilesAway

    MillionMilesAway

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2015
    Messages:
    9,189
    Location:
    London
    seems like a fair summary
     
    razman likes this.
  4. DrBlueBob

    DrBlueBob

    Joined:
    3 Jul 2008
    Messages:
    1,315
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    You forgot one for his knob. :-)
    Edit, @blueinsa Sorry, I'm late to the party...again.
     
    George Hannah likes this.
  5. dickie davies

    dickie davies

    Joined:
    25 Sep 2010
    Messages:
    6,795
    Location:
    Fuck VAR
    Actually I prefer this as it means UEFA have to either find us guilty or not guilty
    If the CAS had said UEFA's case against us was flawed, then we would always be tarnished as the club that got away with it
    At least this way we can clear our name
     
    laserblue and BlueMoonz1977 like this.
  6. George Hannah

    George Hannah

    Joined:
    19 Mar 2009
    Messages:
    16,033
    Location:
    The Barcelona of the North
    Does this imply the Investigatory Chamber decision to refer the matter to the Adjudicatory Chamber for sanction has been overturned?
     
  7. George Hannah

    George Hannah

    Joined:
    19 Mar 2009
    Messages:
    16,033
    Location:
    The Barcelona of the North
    again it seems ;)
     
  8. DrBlueBob

    DrBlueBob

    Joined:
    3 Jul 2008
    Messages:
    1,315
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    Already edited my post to reflect my tardiness GH. :-(
     
  9. Ric

    Ric

    Joined:
    22 May 2004
    Messages:
    37,340
    Must admit, it seemed odd at the time that we were appealing to the CAS before any decision was reached by UEFA.
     
    born2bblu and Keeper! like this.
  10. MillionMilesAway

    MillionMilesAway

    Joined:
    14 Sep 2015
    Messages:
    9,189
    Location:
    London
    No, it means "not our business yet - our rules prevent us ruling on this"

    As far as I see, the IC have investigated and made recommendations to the AC. That's their entire role in it, and sending it to the AC merely means they think it's beyond what the IC are allowed to punish people with (from memory, 100k euros).
    The AC can do what they like with those recommendations, and I assume this will entail assessing whether procedure has been met, strength of evidence if challenged, etc.
     

Share This Page