manclad
Well-Known Member
You are Alexander Armstrong and I claim my £10 reward!!!The first two are pointless. They'd only result in the same amount of agents and sign-on fees being paid in higher salaries to the player
You are Alexander Armstrong and I claim my £10 reward!!!The first two are pointless. They'd only result in the same amount of agents and sign-on fees being paid in higher salaries to the player
liverpool and City are in the same ballpark in terms of turnover. But a club like Newcastle, if taken over will be disadvantaged.Anything that relies on a percentage of turnover cements United's position as the club that can spend the most.
Will they not just pay the “luxury” tax?Particularly if the Saudi’s buy them.liverpool and City are in the same ballpark in terms of turnover. But a club like Newcastle, if taken over will be disadvantaged.
I've said it beofre and I'll say it again. Any system of financial regulation that just looks at the P&L account and doesn't look at a club's holistic financial situation (whih La Liga do appear to do) is completely useless in any meaningful sense.
They've also convinced a generation that the European Cup is a "Champions" league, when it is neither a league or solely competed in by championsThe problem UEFA has is that football has never been fair financially and never will be, but because in their hubris they called their attempts to stop new investment in the sport "fair play" they have convinced a generation of fans that football should be fair.
With that name they made a promise they could never and will never be able to keep.