There’s not enough in the public domain to know whether it is or isn’t, we don’t know what the reason for prosecution not taking place yet is. It also wouldn’t be similar to the charges we were discussing against Connelly so you’d then have to do a comparative to a more similar act once this one gets to prosecution to know.
It still doesn’t change that when you look at the two cases I mentioned and look at the judgments against the sentencing guidelines, neither of those look disproportionate and no one has yet attempted an argument to say they are.
You don't think the Danczuk case qualifies as an offence of distributing material with the intention of stirring up racial hatred?! The person distributing the video said "these fucking white devils" and "I'm gonna put one in his head" if you've not yet seen the video.
Why do you think these cases are taking so long for a charging decision to be made? It doesn't sound like rocket science to work out who the offender was or in the case of the Manchester airport video, which was caught on camera.