Do they have a health policy? I'm reading their 'common sense' politics 'current policy' section and it just doesn't exist.
1. Direct the majority of health care spending to elected County Health Boards, making spending decisions directly accountable to the public locally.
2. Dramatically cut the Department of Health and bring in professional procurement skills to reduce the huge amounts of money wasted in procurement and resource allocation.
3. Prioritise UK taxpayers and citizens, ending health tourism by requiring all those without entitlement to pay in advance.
4. Restore traditional nursing, especially the non-university-trained State Enrolled Nurses or equivalent.
5. Engender a Universal Duty of Care to ensure that everyone is responsible for reporting inadequate care and driving up standards.
1. How will this actually lead to improved service provision? Why is there an assumption that local democracy will prove to be better when local democracy is a farce which barely receives any turnout and will only decline further if attempted to be propagated further i.e. the turnout for the police commissioner elections where average turnout across the country was less than 15%.
2. The NHS is the most efficient health provider in the world, fact. So how can it presumed that their way is more efficient?
3. Figures from the Department of Health show treatment given to foreigners costs £11m a year in net spending, so fuck all. It's not a policy that would save money.
4. What's wrong with university-educated nurses? Seriously? Is it because their university education leads to them being overpaid? If only. Nurses get shit pay and yet apparently we should have lesser trained nurses.
5. Just words. Not even a policy.
So, there we have it. A nest of emptiness, along with the rest of it. They don't have any specific policies. They're just about rhetoric.
THIS is what UKIP are about:
Aim to reduce the public sector to the size it was in 1997, cutting many unnecessary quangos and non-jobs over five years. The goal is to exchange two million public sector jobs for one million new skilled jobs in manufacturing and related services and at least one million additional jobs created as a result of lower personal taxes and reduced business taxation and regulation
They are viciously capitalist - although not viciously libertarian capitalist, as they support subsidies for various things they like... They would cut jobs, absolutely. That's one thing you can trust them to do. You can't trust many governments to be competent enough to do something positive, to be ambitious, to embark on great infrastructural endeavours, to invest efficiently in human capital - like the Nordic social democracies have done for decades. However, even UKIP are competent enough to sack people. Anyway, how's this working out for Greece?
Oops, apparently even the IMF are saying, sorry guys, our bad, we fucked up: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/jun/05/imf-admit-mistakes-greek-crisis-austerity" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013 ... -austerity</a>
Austerity can completely fuck up an economy and send it into a rapidly self-perpetuating downwards spiral. Unfortunately, all our political parties are remaining blasé to the dangers of that, but UKIP are right out in front. Practically cheerleading us to accepting the logic that if you get rid of two million public sector jobs, two million private sector jobs will just spring into existence... Is anyone really buying that? Seriously? Are you watching Greece? Are you watching Spain? We need to get back to economic growth. It is an absolute must. Countries undergoing severe austerity are just getting themselves into a mire.