This is so true, and in saying this I draw a clear distinction between what their supporters have said (which is always going to be OTT, whichever club you're referring to) and what the club, and those at the very heart of its power-base, have been boring the arse off the rest of the footballing world (and dissembling) about for the last generation.
One of the most refreshing aspects about the way City handles itself publicly is that the club, through its officials and management, isn't constantly making references to what the club is about, or what it claims to stand for, because any such utterances are invariably hollow, disingenuous and based on selective memory. They can also make you a hostage to fortune.
I have no real issue with this fee, and through the prism of the money swilling around the upper echelons of the English game, it isn't an egregiously ridiculous sum, taken in isolation. However, the surrounding narrative is of a player who they released, in no small part due to personnel decisions that were forced upon united in the 2011/12 season, when City and united were both chasing a title, and it speaks volumes about the shifting sands of football fortune and how clubs are often forced to abandon all they claim to hold dear to retain a competitive edge. Nothing wrong with that btw, it's footballing Realpolitik.
Above anything else, I hope with all my heart that whatever the next few years bring for us as a club, that officials at City don't start pontificating about "the City way" or claiming that our club is somehow spiritually different from others, because it never can be - not outside our own biased, blinkered footballing minds. The day that happens a part of me will die inside, not least because I know, just like that stretford end banner, that had to be taken down in 2011, it will only come back to bite us in the end.
That is one footballing history lesson that we should try and absorb from united.