MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
I thought it was after,either way,both bookable offences,so shouldn't of been on.
And my point stands.....how is Surman's a yellow and hooters isn't?
Quite.
I thought the throw was quite early on.
I thought it was after,either way,both bookable offences,so shouldn't of been on.
And my point stands.....how is Surman's a yellow and hooters isn't?
Love that Barton with the big nose gesture, superbLooks like our friend Joey Barton standing up to him at 3:44. Well done Joey.
Hate in Amy way to defend the granny banger, but he never claimed he didn't see the incident, he was asked if he was aware of the incident at the time, which he said he was; there is a subtle, yet significant difference.Big conk and mings should both be looking at getting bans,also don't know if it's been mentioned the Rooney interview where he says he seen the stamp when he didn't as tv coverage proves this,should he also face a ban for bringing the game into disrepute over his blatant lying..
Hate in Amy way to defend the granny banger, but he never claimed he didn't see the incident, he was asked if he was aware of the incident at the time, which he said he was; there is a subtle, yet significant difference.
Of course, if the journalist asking the question possessed brains and a backbone his follow up question would have been obvious, but he didn't, of course - most probably because he's thick and/or spineless.
Ok, must have missed that pal. In which case he's a lying granny-banging cünt.I was going to mention that too, but then I heard audio of Rooney clearly saying he had seen it.
Wayne would....Why would anyone want rooney to get a ban????
Ok, must have missed that pal. In which case he's a lying granny-banging cünt.