mac
Well-Known Member
Do you know where the phases I used were from. BroWas that English?
Last edited:
Do you know where the phases I used were from. BroWas that English?
Where they've barely played together which on the balance of probabilities means whoever you were quoting is not rightThis season of course.
I liked his line which later disappeared:Nice line from match report on Beeb, by Phil McNulty, Chief football writer:
The facts of the matter are simple.
City's 2-0 victory margin barely scratches at how much better they were than United.
2 brothers at my work from Derby, same dad, one supports Liverpool, the other Utd. The absolute state of that spunk.
Sane started in every one of our league losses, iirc.IMate, you're supposing a lot.
Sane came on in the 50th minute. The rags had shot their load by then. The formation and game changed. Sane was fresh, the rags had played 50 odd minutes. Sane made an impact. It doesn't necessarily mean that Sane would have had the same impact if he had started the match. He has started matches before and not had the desired effect.
To extrapolate from all that that to not start him was a mistake by Pep is just nonsense.
First time this season we have moved above Liverpool in RAWK's APLT. Nice viewing that graph. At one point we were 9 points behind them.
With all due respect, you are forgetting Rashford's 45 yard toe bung which had commentators in a wankfest frenzy as it sailed over the bar before dipping into the crowd
He needed to borrow some of spit’s spit to clean the stain on his trousers. Dirty old fucker.Tyler got a right stiffy on that one.
A top manager does not slump like this, when faced with the winning goal.I fucking love Pep.