United (A) Post Match Thread

[Impeccable One]

Actually I’ve just this week renewed my contract with BT and now I’m getting a load of SKY channels so I guess I’m now contributing whether I like it or not! Of course it doesn’t include SKY Sports but I have my ways! ;-)

As for my pension I’ve gotta save some for my funeral! Or maybe an 81st party seeing as we weren’t allowed gatherings for my 80th? Which do you think I should aim for? ;-). Do you think Dunnie and VK would come to a party? ;-)

Walker likes a party, providing you invite some ‘nice’ ladies [emoji23]

 

[BringBackSwales]

Actually I’ve just this week renewed my contract with BT and now I’m getting a load of SKY channels so I guess I’m now contributing whether I like it or not! Of course it doesn’t include SKY Sports but I have my ways! ;-)

As for my pension I’ve gotta save some for my funeral! Or maybe an 81st party seeing as we weren’t allowed gatherings for my 80th? Which do you think I should aim for? ;-). Do you think Dunnie and VK would come to a party? ;-)

The worlds youngest octogenarian!

 

[BringBackSwales]

So... don't give the genuine ones to City so we can give all the fake ones to the rags and dippers. Referees should apply the rules not achieve targets set by ...

More often than not the ones we get are when games are already won. Doesn’t assist us but makes the stats look better

 

[BringBackSwales]

Walker likes a party, providing you invite some ‘nice’ ladies [emoji23]

You mean SOME MORE nice ladies. Just clarifying that EB is a nice lady

 

[wahablue]

EB is a very,very nice Lady.

 

[laplandblue]

Capped off my 60th birthday celebrations in style. Thank you City.

Belated birthday wishes. Happy Birthday.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

So city only trained 10 mins of tactical training to defeat rags.
Lol

Stick it on auto pilot.

 

[manchester blue]

I wonder what input our security team have in such situations. If they’re any use they would have vetoed the use of that exit. They should be communicating with their counterparts at OT at a much higher level than your average steward team leader type who would’ve been in charge of organising how far those vermin were kept from the exit. We can exit any door we like and the bucks stops with the guy in charge of our security who should assess that situation and act accordingly

Obvs all that said the main blame lies with poor stewarding and the scrotes involved

This is a reply I got back from United when I emailed them about it. Didn't expect one to be fair.


We note your comments and concerns.

These have been highlighted to the Stadium Safety Team, who work closely with Manchester City’s security and the Premier League, who were both present on the match day. Both Manchester United and Manchester City Security Staff were involved with the egress of both teams at the end of this fixture and this was also carefully monitored by the Stadium Control Room and the Police.

Thank you for taking the time to get in touch with your feedback.

 

[Gundog’s Gundog]

This is a reply I got back from United when I emailed them about it. Didn't expect one to be fair.


We note your comments and concerns.

These have been highlighted to the Stadium Safety Team, who work closely with Manchester City’s security and the Premier League, who were both present on the match day. Both Manchester United and Manchester City Security Staff were involved with the egress of both teams at the end of this fixture and this was also carefully monitored by the Stadium Control Room and the Police.

Thank you for taking the time to get in touch with your feedback.

Doesn’t surprise me. The “security” industry is largely staffed by amateurs and charlatans, most companies like to pay the bare minimum for security and like everything else in life if you pay peanuts you get monkeys.

If you’re wondering how seriously City or Utd or the PL take security you need only look at that video and ask yourself would one of those scrotes have been able to stab a player in the neck if he was determined enough.

 

[BringBackSwales]

This is a reply I got back from United when I emailed them about it. Didn't expect one to be fair.


We note your comments and concerns.

These have been highlighted to the Stadium Safety Team, who work closely with Manchester City’s security and the Premier League, who were both present on the match day. Both Manchester United and Manchester City Security Staff were involved with the egress of both teams at the end of this fixture and this was also carefully monitored by the Stadium Control Room and the Police.

Thank you for taking the time to get in touch with your feedback.

Can I remind you that united is spelled with a small u

 

[halfcenturyup]

Can I remind you that united is spelled with a small u

You are right. CuNTS.

 

[HorlocksWalk]

Can I remind you that united is spelled with a small u

Let him use a capital, most of their fans are from there

 

[manchester blue]

Can I remind you that united is spelled with a small u

Sorry!

 

[dad1971]

I have the rags have just managed their first shot

 

[big gaz]

Can I remind you that united is spelled with a small u

I thought it was SCUM ;-)

 

[Aba452]

What a thread, taken me a week to read through. What a magnificent performance by the majestic boys in blue. Still disgusting that bollock gob wasn't sent off for attempted assault on KdB.

How puerile are their neanderthal supporters?

What a great birthday week off its been!

;-)))))))

 

[M Gaudino]

Read the post again. The point is that referees have to make decisions on the merits of each case. If that means 120 penalties a season then there can be no complaints. On Saturday there was no identifiable contact with the ball and certainly none which altered the course taken by the ball and the contact with Silva's boot counts as a second movement and is a foul anyway. VAR's failure to correct the clear and obvious error is thus a mystery which is reminiscent of the failure to spot or remedy the clear error in the Southampton game last season when Foden was flattened. Where the history comes in is also in the failure to give penalties to unfashionable clubs penalties while unjustifiable penalties have been awarded and confirmed for dives by Salah and non-fouls on rags. Going back to last Saturday tell us all what you didn't see, and when you didn't see it. And what the error was and why it did not warrant overturning.

i cant be arsed reading all that but there was identifiable contact, anyway goodbye

 

[StillBluessinceHydeRoad]

i cant be arsed reading all that but there was identifiable contact, anyway goodbye

Sounds as though you've read it all. Nice if you really mean goodbye.

 

[laplandblue]

Yep didn’t we do one where we did 46 passes to score a goal against the scum.

Recently there were 44 passes. You will probably find it somewhere on social media. I'm sure there is even a version set to the music of Benny Hill.

 

[laplandblue]

They know it's a pen they'd give on another dozen PL grounds. They just decide immediately that we aren't getting what the LotG have determined.

We see it time and again too. City aren't usually allowed penalties unless the game is already decided. This keeps the opposition believing they have a chance along with other decisions for and against. Then some wonder why the opposition always turn up against City but not usually against the favoured clubs.