OB1
Well-Known Member
No,the law is.
You need to do a bit of reading.
So do you.
No,the law is.
You need to do a bit of reading.
I just posted the law off the FA website, I've read it, have you?No,the law is.
You need to do a bit of reading.
Are you Marty McFly?We’re not winning anything this year. It really is that simple
Of course he did . What are you talking about. It’s like you know you’ve made a mistake in what you are talking about but rather than hold your hands up and admit you’re wrong you’re banging on with a load of rubbish.That doesn't affect the law though.Of course he was interfering with play as common sense would dictate but he didn't affect an opponents ability to reach the ball.
The law is total bollocks.
You are correct that the ‘words’ of the clause don‘t expressly mention his type of interference as an offside.
However, he was ‘shepherding the ball’ and protecting it from the defenders.
He was actively playing the ball by doing this, he doesn’t need to touch it, that is clear in the clause.
We didn’t. The ref did.Why oh why do we always let teams back in to the game,, every fuckin time