United Thread 2014/15

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cheadle_hulmeBlue said:
I wish we'd bought shaw he's gonna be a great future lb

The rags are truly blessed with English talent

Shaw: Smalling: Phil the Face: Shrek and just to think they just let Wio go as well. All that Home Grown talent what a youth system; a true credit to their owners
 
tommybooth said:
and they let wellwank go.

What about the mercurial talent that is Tom (Zidane) Cleverley. Surely he's got a future in an England shirt?
 
whp.blue said:
Cheadle_hulmeBlue said:
I wish we'd bought shaw he's gonna be a great future lb

The rags are truly blessed with English talent

Shaw: Smalling: Phil the Face: Shrek and just to think they just let Wio go as well. All that Home Grown talent what a youth system; a true credit to their owners

I get what your on about, but in regards of shaw I think he will be a good player. Lb is somewhere we could have done with aswell
 
Cheadle_hulmeBlue said:
whp.blue said:
Cheadle_hulmeBlue said:
I wish we'd bought shaw he's gonna be a great future lb

The rags are truly blessed with English talent

Shaw: Smalling: Phil the Face: Shrek and just to think they just let Wio go as well. All that Home Grown talent what a youth system; a true credit to their owners

I get what your on about, but in regards of shaw I think he will be a good player. Lb is somewhere we could have done with aswell

Then we could do worse than that lad, Robertson, of Hull & Scotland.
Anyway, back on topic.
United... boo!
 
abu13 said:
aguero93:20 said:
SPIDERBOY said:
Just before I put a dumb rag out of his misery,would I be right in saying they paid falcao £4.5 million for his enormous goal tally so far,or am I off the mark?.........just need to check.

He's been there for 11 weeks or so at £350,000 p/w so £3.5-3.9m or so. They've pretty much paid over £3.5m (not including medical costs) per goal.


That's his wages though not the loan fee which i believe is the £4.5 million quoted, given that we are approaching a third of the way through the season then it makes it a nice round £1.5 million in loan fees on top of the wages. So in total they are looking at over five million so far.

At least mr woodward is safe in the knowledge that the fee for welbeck is being wisely spent....
no wonder mr w is saying no january player arrivals...
£5M so far spunked on a crock,with £65M on a player that doesn,t want to be there...lol
 
IH8MUFC said:
So that's wellbeck 5 falcao 1.

i always thought welbeck would get goals once he starts regular but falcao is different class. had he been fit and with us he'd be in double figures now. injury and platatini put paid to that.
 
oakiecokie said:
abu13 said:
Kris_Musampa said:
Therein lies the problem. Be careful what you wish for with the raggy rag rags. While the Glazers own them, it great entertainment, but God forbid someone with some real dosh steps in, that wont be funny. Unless of course its a consortium fronted by Ray Ranson...
To be honest there is no doubt that the Glazers will ultimately sell out and some real money men will bail them out, its as sure as night follows day any anyone who believes otherwise is deluding themselves. The best senario for us is that they plod along just missing out on the top 4 and the Glazers sit tight. This will allow us to consolidate and remain competitive when it finally happens.

Whilst they "rob Peter to pay Paul" with the problems they have in their American businesses I cannot see them selling out for a very long time.
Long may it continue.

Not only that, it would probably cost something in the region of 1.5 to 2 billion to prise the club away from the Glazers. As much of a cash cow as United is I don't think there would be too many people willing to fork out that amount of money. It's also worth noting that any prospective buyer would also have to take on the £360 million or so of debt as well.

Personally, while I believe the Glazers will sell up eventually I don't think that it will happen in the immediate future unless an offer comes in that is too good to turn down.

Also, a new buyer doesn't necessarily mean that all their problems will go away - they could even end up with worse owners than the Glazers. After all, the Glazers owe United fans nothing after years of abuse and probably won't be arsed who they sell to as long as they get their cash. Of course, the most hilarious scenario is if someone comes in and purchases United in the same way the Glazers did, and loading a mountain of new debt onto the club in the process meaning they have to go through the rigmarole of the last 10 years all over again!
 
M18CTID said:
oakiecokie said:
abu13 said:
To be honest there is no doubt that the Glazers will ultimately sell out and some real money men will bail them out, its as sure as night follows day any anyone who believes otherwise is deluding themselves. The best senario for us is that they plod along just missing out on the top 4 and the Glazers sit tight. This will allow us to consolidate and remain competitive when it finally happens.

Whilst they "rob Peter to pay Paul" with the problems they have in their American businesses I cannot see them selling out for a very long time.
Long may it continue.

Not only that, it would probably cost something in the region of 1.5 to 2 billion to prise the club away from the Glazers. As much of a cash cow as United is I don't think there would be too many people willing to fork out that amount of money. It's also worth noting that any prospective buyer would also have to take on the £360 million or so of debt as well.

Personally, while I believe the Glazers will sell up eventually I don't think that it will happen in the immediate future unless an offer comes in that is too good to turn down.

Also, a new buyer doesn't necessarily mean that all their problems will go away - they could even end up with worse owners than the Glazers. After all, the Glazers owe United fans nothing after years of abuse and probably won't be arsed who they sell to as long as they get their cash. Of course, the most hilarious scenario is if someone comes in and purchases United in the same way the Glazers did, and loading a mountain of new debt onto the club in the process meaning they have to go through the rigmarole of the last 10 years all over again!

no chance of that. anyone buying them now would be mega rich and would not care about any losses, they would be buying it for prestige. they really would become a plaything as at 2 billion the new owners wouldn't make a cent on their outlay.
 
aguero93:20 said:
SPIDERBOY said:
aguero93:20 said:
He's been there for 11 weeks or so at £350,000 p/w so £3.5-3.9m or so. They've pretty much paid over £3.5m (not including medical costs) per goal.

Edit: around £1.7m for the loan fee as well if you were to break it down proportionally.

I had it at 12 weeks @£380,000.........but yours will do fine

Cheers :)

Could easily call it a minimum cost of £5.2m including fee and wages (per goal as well) without any fear of being proven wrong. Make sure you direct the rat in the direction of di Maria's comments about the scum being far from first choice and Bale's agent's comments about turning down more money at the scum while you're at it.

He wouldn't have any of it,adamant that Monaco are paying his wages.....the only thing that really annoyed me about his comments was that a spuds fan started laughing at him before I did.
 
SPIDERBOY said:
aguero93:20 said:
SPIDERBOY said:
I had it at 12 weeks @£380,000.........but yours will do fine

Cheers :)

Could easily call it a minimum cost of £5.2m including fee and wages (per goal as well) without any fear of being proven wrong. Make sure you direct the rat in the direction of di Maria's comments about the scum being far from first choice and Bale's agent's comments about turning down more money at the scum while you're at it.

He wouldn't have any of it,adamant that Monaco are paying his wages.....the only thing that really annoyed me about his comments was that a spuds fan started laughing at him before I did.

a spurs fan you say?

my how the mighty have fallen.
 
-nibz- said:
B2urC87IUAAr5qn.jpg:large
Surprised they missed that byline targets have been surpassed by 40%.
 
M18CTID said:
oakiecokie said:
abu13 said:
To be honest there is no doubt that the Glazers will ultimately sell out and some real money men will bail them out, its as sure as night follows day any anyone who believes otherwise is deluding themselves. The best senario for us is that they plod along just missing out on the top 4 and the Glazers sit tight. This will allow us to consolidate and remain competitive when it finally happens.

Whilst they "rob Peter to pay Paul" with the problems they have in their American businesses I cannot see them selling out for a very long time.
Long may it continue.

Not only that, it would probably cost something in the region of 1.5 to 2 billion to prise the club away from the Glazers. As much of a cash cow as United is I don't think there would be too many people willing to fork out that amount of money. It's also worth noting that any prospective buyer would also have to take on the £360 million or so of debt as well.

Personally, while I believe the Glazers will sell up eventually I don't think that it will happen in the immediate future unless an offer comes in that is too good to turn down.

Also, a new buyer doesn't necessarily mean that all their problems will go away - they could even end up with worse owners than the Glazers. After all, the Glazers owe United fans nothing after years of abuse and probably won't be arsed who they sell to as long as they get their cash. Of course, the most hilarious scenario is if someone comes in and purchases United in the same way the Glazers did, and loading a mountain of new debt onto the club in the process meaning they have to go through the rigmarole of the last 10 years all over again!

They wouldnt take on the debt "as well", it would be factored into the price, as would any other liability that a new owner takes on.

Clearly the Glazers are only in it for the money. In order to get a return on their investment they have to sell or start taking dividends out of the club. I would quite like to see the reaction if they started paying themselves a dividend.

There must be a dwindling number of cash investors who could pay £1-2b without needing a return on their investment. The likelihood is that there will always be some financing costs that will have first call on their cashflow.
 
Glazer not spent 1 cent of there own money Buying the filth using them as the cash cow then when all the debt has been payed off they sell for 2 billion! You have to admire them for that!
 
cibaman said:
M18CTID said:
oakiecokie said:
Whilst they "rob Peter to pay Paul" with the problems they have in their American businesses I cannot see them selling out for a very long time.
Long may it continue.

Not only that, it would probably cost something in the region of 1.5 to 2 billion to prise the club away from the Glazers. As much of a cash cow as United is I don't think there would be too many people willing to fork out that amount of money. It's also worth noting that any prospective buyer would also have to take on the £360 million or so of debt as well.

Personally, while I believe the Glazers will sell up eventually I don't think that it will happen in the immediate future unless an offer comes in that is too good to turn down.

Also, a new buyer doesn't necessarily mean that all their problems will go away - they could even end up with worse owners than the Glazers. After all, the Glazers owe United fans nothing after years of abuse and probably won't be arsed who they sell to as long as they get their cash. Of course, the most hilarious scenario is if someone comes in and purchases United in the same way the Glazers did, and loading a mountain of new debt onto the club in the process meaning they have to go through the rigmarole of the last 10 years all over again!

They wouldnt take on the debt "as well", it would be factored into the price, as would any other liability that a new owner takes on.

Clearly the Glazers are only in it for the money. In order to get a return on their investment they have to sell or start taking dividends out of the club. I would quite like to see the reaction if they started paying themselves a dividend.

There must be a dwindling number of cash investors who could pay £1-2b without needing a return on their investment. The likelihood is that there will always be some financing costs that will have first call on their cashflow.

There's about 300 individuals with a big enough net worth to buy the club without major financing, about 120 have the liquidity to buy it outright without any financing or need for return on investment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top