If the Madrid player are holding that line on the assumption that lad is offside
If the Madrid player has stepped up enough based on him being in an offside position, he's interfering, therefore offside.
It's a horrible grey area thing, but that defender is probably stood there based on him.
If the Madrid player are holding that line on the assumption that lad is offside
If the Madrid player has stepped up enough based on him being in an offside position, he's interfering, therefore offside.
It's a horrible grey area thing, but that defender is probably stood there based on him.
It's not an offside mate, give it up. Only if he goes for ball and if he blocks goalkeeper. Everything else is onside.
And RM should have been out of sight before the rags first opportunityBeen over-hearing heartache and sob stories all morning in work. Amongst the more delusional ones:
Hose A's heroes,
Plucky, gallant display,
Should've scored 4 or 5,
We're gonna walk the League,
We'd half a Team on,
Crap competition anyway,
Not much difference between the two sides.
Dry your fucking eyes. The work Rags are incapable of thinking for themselves due to incessant brain-washing by mainstream media.
He scores in the same passage of play as the original shot is taken and he's gained an advantage by being in an offside position when the shot was struck
If that isn't offside then the offside law isn't fit for purpose