Rashford could be very good for Pep, for sure.
United fans are rather frustrated with how stupid he is in possession. His go to tactic is to run fast and kick it hard (cross or shot). He has an irritating habit of shooting from stupid angles. His first touch and heading also leave a bit to be desired. In fact his not amazing close control is probably the biggest thing holding him back if he were to be in a Guardiola side. Also, Mourinho sticking him on the wing for two and a half years has arguably slowed his progression as a central player down significantly, given his age. He's suffering under Solskjaer because he's being coached awfully in those senses. His approach may have worked 15 years ago but not anymore.
He does have positives though. Southgate has really improved his off-the-ball movement, which is a big thing for Pep of course. Plus there's the obvious; he works really hard, is very fast, quite skillful, a decent creative knack, and he has a seriously mean right foot.
I think Pep could definitely iron out a lot of the negatives and make the most out of the positives. But on that note, I actually think there are a LOT of players that could be said for. Wingers are the Guardiola specialty when it comes to making the most out of. If he could get Martial's attitude in order (which is near impossible) then he'd be a much better option.
Despite Rashford being the best English player ever and always, I think there are plenty of more applicable players out there, even ones we haven't thought of yet. Notably ones with better close ball control.
Haha 'played for a proper club'Oh no,he'd have to be realistic if he played for a proper club.
Kudos to him for trying to screw the rag cvnts over though :-)
De Ligt
De Lig
De Li
De L
De
D
De
Del
Delig
Deligh
Delight
Delighte
Delighted to extend Phil Jones's contract!
Haha 'played for a proper club'
They all were that day. A stellar performance.Do you watch them a lot, like? You know, United.
I only watch them if they're getting rogered. I must admit to watching them a bit more often than I used to. Rashford was really good at Goodison the other month.
He’s not that good at all. And that’s in many Rags’ opinions... https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/tribuna.com/amp/manutd/en/news/3381583/You all realize that I detest the scum, but ffs, rashford is not Phil jones,he really is pretty fucking good and would be a good addition.
My thoughts exactly, he is not good enough to play for City or warm the bench ... He is another over hyped kid churned out of old toilet that will never achieve what he has been hyped up to do. He's still better than that weasel faced **** Lingard though ..
He’s not that good at all. And that’s in many Rags’ opinions... https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/tribuna.com/amp/manutd/en/news/3381583/
I don’t know many Rags to speak to (by choice) but none of the ones I know rate Rashford.
They all think he’s very unfit, can’t last a full game, dips in and out of games, some say he can’t finish and others say he just leathers the ball as hard as he can all the time and sometimes it looks a great finish.
I'm better than Lingard and I stopped playing 18 years ago.My thoughts exactly, he is not good enough to play for City or warm the bench ... He is another over hyped kid churned out of old toilet that will never achieve what he has been hyped up to do. He's still better than that weasel faced **** Lingard though ..
I'm better than Lingard and I stopped playing 18 years ago.
Jesus that clip had me in stitches mate. Brilliant sums up my reaction to the rashforsd is good posts. Rashford is poo end of.
Tbf no, he has that over me.But can you dance like him?
Tbf no, he has that over me.