United thread 2020/21

[bluemoon32]

The narrative now seems to be that United fans are the saviours of our game, who'd have thunk it

 

[bluemoon32]

Neville knows what he's doing the slimy rag turd. He's pushing for reform in the hope that if such reform happens it clips our owners wings and allows the rags to close the gap. He's a dangerous **** and should never be trusted.

Yep

 

[Chev Chelios]

 

[TheThirdDeano]

I fucking hate. DESPISE the fucking parasites in the media. Every thing wrong with society is caused by these utter cunts.

And the Rags, the less said about my anomysity about them the better, I'd hate to be banned again

 

[Bluekiwi]

Just seen this on the web .....................

FA rule book
It reads: "In the event of a match being abandoned due to the conduct of one Club or its members or supporters the Board has the power to order that the match is not replayed and to award either one or three points to the Club not at fault.

"It cannot levy a financial penalty due to the conduct of a Club."
However, due to the fact that the police were among those to decide that the game could not commence, the Premier League would state that the decision was not up to United.
Section L.12 states: "A League Match shall not be postponed or abandoned except: (L.12.1.) when on the date fixed for it to be played either the Home Club or the Visiting Club is competing in a competition permitted by Rules L.9.1, L.9.2, and L.9.3; (L.12.2.) with the approval of or on the instructions of the officiating referee; (L.12.3.) by order of the police; (L.12.4.) by order of any other authority exercising its statutory powers to that effect; or (L.12.5.) on the instructions of or with the prior written consent of the Board."

With both clubs agreeing to the decision to postpone the match, it remains to be seen whether any sanctions will come into effect.

I suspect that the corrupt clowns who run the game will blame the police and therefore no sanctions for the scum

 

[Bluekiwi]

Surly this has to be a points deduction?

According to the rule book that is a definite option - but do not hold your breath

 

[urban genie]

The narrative now seems to be that United fans are the saviours of our game, who'd have thunk it

Like how FC Scum are the heroes of non league

This mythical bullshit over one worst fans fanbases in the country is quite pathetic.

Let then have the 50+1 and a owner who keeps them debt free and financially balancing the books more likely at the expence of top 10 football, european games and trophies , because what will happen is these mard cunts with just proptest and riot about that that because their delusion they should be at the top is constant.

They have form from the 70s onwards of hissy fits and tantrums when they don't like something.

 

[bluetonium]

Have to say in a little surprised that not one of the papers I have seen do far has show s picture of the violent side of yesterday.

They had a policeman covered in blood, glass bottles bring chucked at officials and fans squaring up to each other to choose from. But most just show fans with flares.

Why? Isn't showing the other side of the 'protest' just or, or even more, newsworthy? Why wouldn't they show the pictures? Starting to smell very odd this.

 

[Wretched Vengeance]

Keane wants the owners out, but keeps banging on about them buying Kane and Grealish - a move that would cost , I'm guessing, roughly £200 million.

 

[Revolver]

Yesterday’s tantrum will be spun as an heroic attempt to reclaim the game. Always desperate for attention to prove they are special a points deduction or Neville getting a ban will give them the kudos they don’t deserve. Best response is just to laugh (Admittedly if this had been City fans this would be classed as spoilt fans rioting and we would be punished)