United thread 2020/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have just looked at the MUEN page, and despite having given OGS the funds to buy the likes of Maguire, Fernandes, Van Der Beek, Wan Bissake and others, they are saying that the Glazers need to back the manager to buy the players that they need.

Why can they never accept and point out that the manager has been backed by the owners , spent huge amounts, but bought players who are either not suitable or good enough ?

Fucking pathetic waste of newsprint in a feeble attempt to move blame for total incompetence and running of the club .

The facts are there if they bothered to look, the club is arroganr and inept from top to bottom apart from attracting sponsorship partners !
 
Why can they never accept and point out that the manager has been backed by the owners , spent huge amounts, but bought players who are either not suitable or good enough ?
I think deep down they know it. Some of the rags that infest this particular corner of England's green and pleasant accept that the Glazers have spent money, a lot of money, but they don't want to admit that it's been wasted on players that successive management teams have been unable to get the best out of.

You mentioned a few of the players that have come and gone from the swamp in the last few years, and I believe that under a good manager some of those players (Magliar not included) would have gone on to fulfill their potential. The fact that they didn't is down to bad management.
 
Yet non of them go. It amazes me when rags say we are the most supported club in the world. Do they honestly think these supporters in Asia and Africa nip down to their local Rag store and buy a legitimate shirt.
There are a lot of Rag's on the planet, but I recon they are not as popular as they make out. I think it's a myth perpetuated by the club in order that they can secure loans against potential future earnings.
 
There are a lot of Rag's on the planet, but I recon they are not as popular as they make out. I think it's a myth perpetuated by the club in order that they can secure loans against potential future earnings.
Someone linked a good article on here which showed where the mythical 695m came from. Absolute nonsense around manipulation of statistical data, but nothing any of us didn't suspect.
 
Someone linked a good article on here which showed where the mythical 695m came from. Absolute nonsense around manipulation of statistical data, but nothing any of us didn't suspect.
Bollocks, it's the truth, every last bit of it. One tenth of the earths population is a match going, season ticket holding, shirt buying, family related, locally born, true red. We were told...so there.
 
Why can they never accept and point out that the manager has been backed by the owners , spent huge amounts, but bought players who are either not suitable or good enough ?
Because if they (and that includes Camelgob and co.) accept that, it would be admitting their beloved scum of a team is managed by a mediocre coach.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.