Tuesday nights at the Conti. Takes me back.If you never went to the Conti you never lived :)
It was actually called the New Continental.
View attachment 11935
Tuesday nights at the Conti. Takes me back.If you never went to the Conti you never lived :)
It was actually called the New Continental.
View attachment 11935
Reading between the lines...you dont seem to have a lot of time for our red brethren do you ?It's what Rashford does off the pitch that is keeping his name in the public's conscious, but that's exactly how it's always been with the rags. The oxygen of publicity is what keeps the club going.
I have always thought Beckscum was arguably the single most overrated player in the history of English football. But his craving for publicity is what has made him a household name, not his footballing skills.
The same with Rashford, I do not see a good player in him, never have done. He is a typical rag product: over-hyped and placed on a pedestal by the tabloid press. The odd flash of talent now and again does not a good player make.
We all know what it''s like with the rags: a player comes up through the ranks and makes his Premier league debut. That night on MotD the studio is awash with gallons of semen. Lineker, Shearer, and whoever else are waxing lyrical over this 'fantastic, genius who will go on to be one of the games' biggest stars' blah blah blah...Within 18 months he's playing for whoever Steve Bruce is managing at the time. Then it's back on the merry-go-round for another rag academy player who is 'taking the world by storm'.
The rags today are a bland and vacuous product churning out money for the Glazers. They haven't been about football for as long as I can remember: as artificial as those dreadful American soaps of the 80's - all shoulder pads and lip gloss.
Fuck that for a sport.
Nurse’s night midweek...
Unbelievable! Their revenue has been €1.29bn over the last two yearsPlus the 60 million they just borrowed that the BBC hid on the Utd page and not main football page
Manchester United borrow £60m to help deal with financial impact of coronavirus
Manchester United borrowed £60m to help cushion the financial impact of the coronavirus pandemic, their second-quarter figures show.www.bbc.co.uk
I still think though the PL dropping some of its FFP rules on the quiet inc wage increases the other year when the Rags desperately needed to renew multiple contracts and spend heavily was dodgy to see the least
£1.084bn expenditure on transfers since Ferguson left.I was wondering earlier would the Rags have been any worse off if they had stuck with Moyes and given him time to build the team he wanted, when you look at the money they have spunked away over those years with managers coming and going with differing ways of playing how could it have been any worse?
My work here is done.Thanks for sharing.
A well used saying we have about poor strikers, is 'He couldn't score in the Conti on nurse's night'Nurse’s night midweek...
Huge mistake..£1.084bn expenditure on transfers since Ferguson left.
They’ve even spent £33.2m in manager compensation after sacking the numerous managers they’ve sacked (remember when they said they weren’t a sacking club?!).
They definitely sacked Moyes too early and he wouldn’t have spent what has been spent.
You've fucking done it nowMust be an eye injury seeing as he can't stay onside or hit a barn door.