Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Sly cunts.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
United Thread - 2021/22
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 18,221
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Leicester have had their request to postpone tomorrow’s match against the Spuds turned down by the FA, what’s fecking difference comparing it to the Rags postponement?
Leicester play in blue and do not have billions of braindead lemmings amongst their supporters .
bluevillain
Well-Known Member
Maybe old Ralph has a secret health/energy potion that needs a couple of days for the body to assimilate.
ninjamonkey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 18,768
Leicester and spurs both wanted their game postponed, both have more individual cases than united yet their request is rejected. Exactly as I predicted last week, without strict guidelines it becomes a farce.
I don't actually see it as an advantage for United, they're still in Europe (for now) they'll struggle to fit the game in and there's no guarantee they won't have more cases whenever that is, I think the most advantageous thing for all clubs is to get as many games played as possible but it's still a complete joke that one side with less cause for postponement can have their request accepted but 2 clubs both with more cause can be rejected 48 hours later.
I don't actually see it as an advantage for United, they're still in Europe (for now) they'll struggle to fit the game in and there's no guarantee they won't have more cases whenever that is, I think the most advantageous thing for all clubs is to get as many games played as possible but it's still a complete joke that one side with less cause for postponement can have their request accepted but 2 clubs both with more cause can be rejected 48 hours later.
foggy1974
Well-Known Member
I heard that Luke Shaw couldn't recall how many different flavoured pasties, Gregg's make & thats why he was subbed due to concussion protocolsI heard the ref asked him if he knew what day it was, and he didn't. Unfortunately the ref didn't realise that he really doesn't know what day it is.
Do we know that Leicester and Spurs have more individual cases than United? There were reports that Tottenham wanted the game postponed so they could play Rennes so it can't have been that bad there.Leicester and spurs both wanted their game postponed, both have more individual cases than united yet their request is rejected. Exactly as I predicted last week, without strict guidelines it becomes a farce.
I don't actually see it as an advantage for United, they're still in Europe (for now) they'll struggle to fit the game in and there's no guarantee they won't have more cases whenever that is, I think the most advantageous thing for all clubs is to get as many games played as possible but it's still a complete joke that one side with less cause for postponement can have their request accepted but 2 clubs both with more cause can be rejected 48 hours later.
I don't see it as an advantage to them either.
abu13
Well-Known Member
I read that Leicester have 9 positive cases, Spurs had similar and Brighton 4 cases so they account for around 50% of the cases identified. I guess if the Rags have more than 10 players affected then there may be some merit in the decision but would be amazed if that was the case, Yesterday it was being reported as 4 players.
Don't know how many anyone had, all we do know is that the players below never had it.... pretty much a full squad. (Source MEN)Do we know that Leicester and Spurs have more individual cases than United? There were reports that Tottenham wanted the game postponed so they could play Rennes so it can't have been that bad there.
I don't see it as an advantage to them either.
Confirmed United players who were at Carrington on Wednesday:
Cristiano Ronaldo, Fred, Victor Lindelof, Marcus Rashford, Eric Bailly, Raphael Varane, Diogo Dalot, Scott McTominay, Anthony Martial, Aaron Wan-Bissaka, Lee Grant, David de Gea, Bruno Fernandes, Edinson Cavani, Phil Jones, Alex Telles, Tahith Chong, Paul Pogba.
Furthermore the following statement tells us they never had any positive cases, does it not? They just did not want to face Brentford!
"Given cancellation of training and disruption to the squad, and with the health of players and staff the priority, The Club requested the match to be rearranged. The Premier League Board took the decision to postpone based on guidance from medical advisors.
"Manchester United regrets the inconvenience caused to Brentford FC and to the fans of both clubs by Covid-19."
It was a rhetorical question. :-)Leicester play in blue and do not have billions of braindead lemmings amongst their supporters .
Leicesters 9 were a combination of covid and injuries players I think.I read that Leicester have 9 positive cases, Spurs had similar and Brighton 4 cases so they account for around 50% of the cases identified. I guess if the Rags have more than 10 players affected then there may be some merit in the decision but would be amazed if that was the case, Yesterday it was being reported as 4 players.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.