Yeah, I wont deny it's annoying looking at how much Liverpool have raked in from player sales though. An extra £238m with 118 fewer player sales. United brought in just £7m less than City have, with 144 fewer player sales.
It's clear we should be doing better in that area but I still think there must have been a pact with the clubs that did have the money, to offer City peanuts for good players. I also think, the fact that City didn't cash in on players like Silva and Aguero and so on, is a good thing for football, rather than a bad one. It shows all the people claiming City built a team of mercenaries were wrong.