United Thread - 2021/22

[BlueBas]

In a couple of years they should remake the milk advert from the 80s. If you don't drink your milk you'll only be good enough to play for Man Utd!

 

[laplandblue]

His face after the pen was almost expecting that reaction poor kid. As if you blame your 7th penalty taker for not beating boro

Poor lad, nobody should be subjected to that.

 

[West Yorks Owl]

Can I ask a question, a few years ago the away fan rule was brought in by the PL, where opposition fans had to b pitchside. The 2 teams (off the top of my head) that didn't do this were Newcastle & Manchester United.

Just having a quick Google and Newcastle were granted an indefinite exemption due to safety concerns between fans, but what about Manchester United, as surely where away fans are is not classed as pitchside?

 

[Bluesince1979]

" Plastic
"Plastic" the highest number of supporters that have supported for 25 years or more. 30, 000 supporters in the second division. " We're shit " brilliant.

Its the pain behind the eyes pretended hes not bothered. Fat prick

 

[Blue Mist]

Can I ask a question, a few years ago the away fan rule was brought in by the PL, where opposition fans had to b pitchside. The 2 teams (off the top of my head) that didn't do this were Newcastle & Manchester United.

Just having a quick Google and Newcastle were granted an indefinite exemption due to safety concerns between fans, but what about Manchester United, as surely where away fans are is not classed as pitchside?

The rags also use the safety rule.

 

[Deleted member 77198]

Thing is nobody else wants it to end................. they aren't the club they were and need to understand that

“I was 20 the last time we won the Premier League and next year I’ll be 30, should that really happen?!”

With Rags, it’s that collective lack of understanding that things don’t last forever and that they’ve never been a club who’ve always been at the top, that gets me.

Outside Magnall, Busby, and Ferguson, United have only won five trophies and for the most part outside those three managers they’ve just been any old run-of-the-mill English football club. Mostly in the First Division/Premier League not doing much, sometimes in the Second Division, at times getting average league attendances of 11,000 and individual league attendances of 3,000, and going bust. That’s why Gary Neville saying, last year, that “Manchester United are the grandfathers of English football” was such a fucking stupid comment!

This attitude where they think they should be up the top of the league challenging is utter fucking delusion. Whenever United haven’t had a decent manager in place, whenever there have been better run clubs than them, they haven’t ever really been a club up there challenging.

This is actually true of all clubs in English football. English football doesn’t really have any clubs who are, far and away, out of reach of the rest of the pack when it comes to success. 20 league titles isn’t that many, in future decades there could be a few clubs up at that level, because it’s not overly dominant. There aren't any clubs in England who have always been up at the top, always challenging, always winning something every few years. And I don’t think there ever will be. This is what makes English football the best! There are far too many decent clubs with decent potential for any club in England to just always be dominant like a Rangers/Celtic or Nacional/Peñarol situation where they’ve all won over 100 trophies each and always been the dominant clubs in Scotland and Uruguay. England’s top clubs have always and will always be fluctuating and it would only take a decent few decades for any club to catch anyone else up. Because that’s all United (and Liverpool) ever really had to put them where they are in their own standing; a few good decades. Away from that, they’ve just been clubs like any other.

There have been other eras where clubs were dominant, only for their time at the top to come to an end and these clubs fall away from the top. Villa, Sunderland, Everton… Arsenal had a few goes, Liverpool had their turn, United had theirs… City and Chelsea are in their great eras now… in future decades Newcastle, Leeds, Spurs, and West Ham could be the clubs who takeover at the top if they get the right investment and use it well with the right boardrooms and right managers/players, because they certainly all have the potential to… that would be reasonable to think would happen because that’s how English football has always worked.

This notion that not winning or challenging for the title isn’t good enough for United is completely out of touch with the reality of English football.

 

[Tanzeylee]

They are having a ceremony today at the swamp if anybody is interested. It is 64 years ago that they are remembering.

HYPOCRITES

Sponsored by teamviewer?

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

“I was 20 the last time we won the Premier League and next year I’ll be approaching 30, should that really happen?!”

Thick fucker can't even do simple arithmetic. If he was born in 1993 then he'll be approaching 30 now. They are so deluded they think time should stop for them.

 

[waspish]

“I was 20 the last time we won the Premier League and next year I’ll be approaching 30, should that really happen?!”

With Rags, it’s that collective lack of understanding that things don’t last forever and that they’ve never been a club who’ve always been at the top, that gets me.

Outside Magnall, Busby, and Ferguson, United have only won five trophies and for the most part outside those three managers they’ve just been any old run-of-the-mill English football club. Mostly in the First Division/Premier League not doing much, sometimes in the Second Division, at times getting average league attendances of 11,000 and individual league attendances of 3,000, and going bust.

This attitude where they think they should be up the top of the league challenging is utter fucking delusion. Whenever United haven’t had a decent manager in place, whenever there have been better run clubs than them, they haven’t ever really been a club up there challenging.

This is actually true of all clubs in English football. English football doesn’t really have any clubs who are, far and away, out of reach of the rest of the pack when it comes to success. There aren't any clubs in England who have always been up at the top, always challenging, always winning something every few years. And I don’t think there ever will be. There are far too many decent clubs with decent potential for any club in England to just always be dominant like a Rangers/Celtic or Nacional/Peñarol situation where they’ve all won over 100 trophies each and always been the dominant clubs in Scotland and Uruguay. England’s top clubs have always and will always be fluctuating and it would only take a decent few decades for any club to catch anyone else up. Because that’s all United (and Liverpool) ever really had to put them where they are in their own standing; a few good decades. Away from that, they’ve just been clubs like any other.

There have been other eras where clubs were dominant, only for their time at the top to come to an end and these clubs fall away from the top. Villa, Sunderland, Everton… Arsenal had a go for a while, Liverpool had their turn, United had theirs… City and Chelsea are in their great eras now… in future decades Newcastle, Leeds, Spurs, and West Ham could be the clubs who takeover at the top if they get the right investment and use it well with the right boardrooms and right managers/players, because they certainly all have the potential to… that would be reasonable to think would happen because that’s how English football has always worked.

This notion that not winning or challenging for the title isn’t good enough for United is completely out of touch with the reality of English football.

It’s 30 years of sky brain washing them into “this is ****united” sorry like you posted they should look at there history! They ain’t a Madrid a Barcelona a rangers a Celtic they are just another club who has 15/20 years winning everything with a top manager!

 

[manimanc]

Wasn't there supposed to be a protest today?