They seem to clamour for the ‘German model’ of fan ownership 50+1 (because that’s worked out brilliantly with Bayern winning 10 in a row… and having the inflated and biggest sponsorships with related members on the executive), which would be a recipe for disaster - fan ownership and decision making involvement by people entirely unsuited to running a football club.
In further lack of understanding of capitalism they think that Saudi PIF should sell-on Newcastle to a private Saudi investor and take on Trafford instead … despite it being obvious that the potential for profit of Newcastle is way more.
Trafford is encumbered with large debt, failing infrastructure needing replacement (ground & training), lack of potential growth opportunities, lack of adjacent area commercial expansion, flatlined and now falling commercial revenues, most expensive ongoing squad wages, random scattergun transfer business, random coaching and managing styles, many ex current players speaking out about the stagnated time warp culture, toxic vocal unreasonable and unrealistic fanbase, still loomed over by the shuffling shadow of the past… off the top of my head.
I suppose on the positive side for any investors, they have:
Guaranteed English National team players.
Endless reams of media pieces.
Endless Ex players in the media.
Lots to chat about the importance of ‘istree.
…I can see why they are thought as such a good deal for anyone who manages to gloss over the real negatives, because of the artificial positives above. Muppets.