United Thread - 2023/24

[RodneyRodney]

No.
I do subscribe to his very informative school of thought though!

You & KB could collaborate on a book . . .

 

[Shirley]

Anyone have a pic of that rag banner saying how they make history and we ….?

 

[Wretched Vengeance]

 

[TonyM]

Why the long face?

 

[RadcliffeRick]

Anyone have a pic of that rag banner saying how they make history and we ….?

Merry Christmas, enjoy their pain:-)

 

[CTID1977]

take it

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Ha ha ha ha ha Louis Edwards woud be so proud
View attachment 102008

Difficult to see how they can’t be prosecuted under the Food Safety and Hygiene (England) Regulations 2013 for that. Medium culpability/high risk of harm means a huge fine. Given the club’s turnover, a quarter of a million quid would seem about right, less credit for a guilty plea (assuming they so plead).

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Christ, BBC excusing the hygiene rating already- “Man United act after one-star rating“ act as in trying to deny… https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67808736

Not sure why they think the inspection would have been carried out by the Food Standards Agency. It would surely have been environmental health officers from Trafford Council deploying the FSA rating scheme following the inspection.

The standard of journalism in this country is an absolute fucking joke.

 

[East Level 2]

Trafford Borough Council? That will confuse two types of supporter.

 

[Blue Floyd]

Difficult to see how they can’t be prosecuted under the Food Safety and Hygiene (England) Regulations 2013 for that. Medium culpability/high risk of harm means a huge fine. Given the club’s turnover, a quarter of a million quid would seem about right, less credit for a guilty plea (assuming they so plead).

Just remember whos eating the shite.