United Thread - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
jacko74 said:
I could look like a "world beater" if I was given as much time and space as he had against that Villa defence last night.

That was the worst defensive performance I've seen by any team all season, its astonishing the rags only managed to score 3.
Click to expand...
Tottingham against Chelsea was just as bad , suicidal high line but the chavs were too stupid to take advantage and could have scored ten
 
jacko74 said:
What gets me is the BBC technically isn't even a commercial entity "due to the unique way it's funded" so it isn’t actually reliant on advertising revenue... yet it's still just as determined, if not more so, than the commercial media and broadcasters to blow smoke up the arse of Manchester united football club and its supporters.
Click to expand...
They still sell quite a lot of content abroad - because they have to.
They have more than a few top-earners (not just in front of the camera) all of whom will be under pressure to "prove their worth". The only way to do that, as far as the thick twat politicians are concerned is the tun a profit. (Rather than say, produce artistic or investigative excellence). Whether we like it or not, blowing smoke up the rags arse is a proven profit-maker.
Everybody wans to keep their job. If BBC execs don't turn a profit, the Tories, for example, will happily replace the top mam with a proven Tory who will gladly do their bidding. In fact, they already have.
When people on the Media Discussion thread keep calling for the BBC to be dismantled and sold off, they're playing right into the greedy hands of the same breed of politicians who have made water supply, train services and energy supply worse but somehow more expensive and will soon argir the only way to "save the NHS" is by selling bits of it off..
As the old saying goes, people who know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
The BBC are a shower of shit when it comes to denigrating City and glorifying the red clubs. Jealousy plays a part on a personal level but there's more at play than spite and bias.
 
Good result for City last night, dont think new part owners would of minded to lose too much as it would of made getting rid of the manager far easier and make changes they want. Now they are stuck with him for a few more weeks and as we all know will revert to more crappy performances, its the "United Way"!!!
 
ysmsa said:
That silly "welcome" board in Trafford has been up for a Month!

So the "Era" started then when they continued to be shit or, the Xmas Eve announcement was the biggest pile of manipulative shite ever pushed.

I don't believe for 1 minute that anything was concluded on Xmas Eve which also happened to be a Sunday.

Those fucking Yanks are playing their dumb fuck fan base like never before.

Remember "Forward with Franny"

This is " Backwards with Jimmy"
Click to expand...
Or reverse with ratcliffe
 
kippaxwarrior said:
Ratcliffe has not bought 25% of the club.

The glazers owned 69% of the club and Ratcliffe has bought 25% of that. So if my maths are correct he actually only owns 14% of the club and paid £1.2B for the privilege
Click to expand...

If you look at the % Glazers actually own 50.4%

% after all of $300m raise
Glazers: 50.4% A/Bs
Ratcliffe: 28.9% A/Bs
Others: 20.6% all A
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.