United Thread - 2023/24

[journolud]

I read that they were flying him back on a private jet so he could play the cup game next week against Newport.
Thier 2nd keeper must be really shite if they are flying him back for a game against Newport.

Apparently Cameroon are paying for the private jet to get rid of the useless twat

Surely it’s Newport who are paying to have him back in time to face them.

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

Love that gooner, he's the Martin Samuels of the fan blogs.

The Rag just didn’t get it because he’s been brainwashed by the media. That’s the power they bring to the sport by reporting it as a minor breach.

 

[JASR]

The Rag just didn’t get it because he’s been brainwashed by the media. That’s the power they bring to the sport by reporting it as a minor breach.

Yet another example of a united fan knowing diddly about their own team. Fancy not knowing that they breached by 47m to only get a 300k fine.
everton (and all other) fans outrage should be directed at united and uefa for the blatant discrepancy in outcomes, they can’t complain about getting their penalty that they voted for, but they sure as hell can complain about the slap on the wrist united got for double the breach.

 

[give it to gordon]

Yet another example of a united fan knowing diddly about their own team. Fancy not knowing that they breached by 47m to only get a 300k fine.
everton (and all other) fans outrage should be directed at united and uefa for the blatant discrepancy in outcomes, they can’t complain about getting their penalty that they voted for, but they sure as hell can complain about the slap on the wrist united got for double the breach.

The thing I dont understand as both clubs failed that 3 year 105 lost. If rags failed it under UEFA rules of losing 105m how come they passed the pl rules of not losing 105m ?

 

[JASR]

The thing I dont understand as both clubs failed that 3 year 105 lost. If rags failed it under UEFA rules of losing 105m how come they passed the pl rules of not losing 105m ?

Indeed, I was waiting for THREE clubs to have been put on notice that they have failed the PL ffp last week, Everton and Forest were announced, but (to paraphrase the Neanderthal hordes) ‘what about united?’

<swept under carpet.gif>

 

[Inter Me Nan]

The thing I dont understand as both clubs failed that 3 year 105 lost. If rags failed it under UEFA rules of losing 105m how come they passed the pl rules of not losing 105m ?

Good question, swept under the carpet is my guess.

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

Good question, swept under the carpet is my guess.

Is it because we changed the rules to become PSR just as they are about to fail FFP?

 

[give it to gordon]

Good question, swept under the carpet is my guess.

But if this is the case why arent other clubs pointing this out. Why are they just moaning about their charges and not pointing out an other club that's done the same.

Why dont all the clubs come together and fight these red top and spuds.

Everton having nothing to lose point the finger at rags. Everton were only 19m over rags 45m over.

Pl is interesting Chelsea

 

[Inter Me Nan]

Is it because we changed the rules to become PSR just as they are about to fail FFP?

You could be right mate don't know, all a bit fishy though.

 

[give it to gordon]

Is it because we changed the rules to become PSR just as they are about to fail FFP?

But how would that change utd being 45m over the 105m in a 3 year period ? We know utd are because they failed UEFA ffp. So how do they pass pl psr ?