r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
8.6 million rabbit currantsLira ?
8.6 million rabbit currantsLira ?
I'll leave you to your views about how a drunken women should be treated by 2 men.What evidence is that then?
Oh, and I take it you mean the prosecution’s evidence? The prosecution’s evidence that ultimately failed that is. What next? That the prosecution’s evidence in the Stefan Kiszko case meant that he was a despicable person?
Seriously mate, is this the best you can come up with? How do you know she was presenting as drunk at the time she had sex with them both? How do you know they weren’t drunk too? You do realise that casual sex - sometimes drunken, sometimes not - happens all over the place all of the time don’t you?I'll leave you to your views about how a drunken women should be treated by 2 men.
That’s not grammar; it’s spelling.
Proper made me chuckle that.8.6 million rabbit currants
Is the correct answer.That’s not grammar; it’s spelling.
Precedent.