United Thread | 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
mancboy said:
I am glad he still holds that kind of power, his choice of wee davey was outstanding.
Click to expand...

The problem is that the finger will never be pointed at him.

The management failures will never be seen as part of his history at the club, his work is done influencing the weak who carry out his orders.

Pretty convinced that is why certain managers will have walked away when tapped up to replace the dutch dope.
 
Colin Bells Boots said:
The problem is that the finger will never be pointed at him.

The management failures will never be seen as part of his history at the club, his work is done influencing the weak who carry out his orders.

Pretty convinced that is why certain managers will have walked away when tapped up to replace the dutch dope.
Click to expand...
any strong competent manager will not want that old drunk watching over there every move and offering opinions, they will want the ability to be their own man and shape their own team and that will not be offered while he is about, the only person who challenged him was rangnick and he was swept out the door the moment he did.
 
mancboy said:
any strong competent manager will not want that old drunk watching over there every move and offering opinions, they will want the ability to be their own man and shape their own team and that will not be offered while he is about, the only person who challenged him was rangnick and he was swept out the door the moment he did.
Click to expand...

Thinking about it I hope he lasts for a good number of years.

Their success in his " advisory role " is absolute dross in return for circa £2m a season.
 
tweety said:
There's no top manager out there that would touch them with a shitty stick because it's career suicide.
Click to expand...
Not when the Govan Bully is behind the scenes. And what too manager is there. We’ve the best. Klopp can’t go there. After that, meh.
 
Vienna_70 said:
I was about to post that about Allegri and the pisscan, having just had a gander at the Beeb's gossip column.

I think that leaves us in no doubt that Bluemooners have been right all along about the amount of power the purple-nosed one still wields at rag central.
Click to expand...
I have heard that Catweazle is trying to reduce his influence. If true that’s bad news.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
It’s not PGMOL that rescind it, it goes to a 3 man FA tribunal made up of ex players and refs, a bit like our 115 panel.

They only other time I can think of that it’s been successful was MacAllister last season, but there may have been a few others.
Click to expand...

Yeah and who is on the panel, I can bet a nice gift like a watch was waiting in the post for all 3 of them
As I said, any City player on a red card that appealed would never get to the tribunal panel.

Can I say VAR was sold to the premier league clubs on the clear and obvious mistakes that the referee makes
So how does the clear and obvious mistakes still happening in the VAR system, What is the point of VAR if mistakes are not taken out of the game and still happen in the system.

That tackle was with full intent, forget the slipp he could have injured the player badly and would have been out for months, The referee deemed it bad enough for a red card and after VAR review it stayed with the on-field referee choice.

Just like the fudging of the £75 million in the PSR with Covid-19 and the Glazers sale share fees to Jim, It was cleared by the panel and nothing was wrong because it involved United
 
ancoats said:
Yeah and who is on the panel, I can bet a nice gift like a watch was waiting in the post for all 3 of them
As I said, any City player on a red card that appealed would never get to the tribunal panel.

Can I say VAR was sold to the premier league clubs on the clear and obvious mistakes that the referee makes
So how does the clear and obvious mistakes still happening in the VAR system, What is the point of VAR if mistakes are not taken out of the game and still happen in the system.

That tackle was with full intent, forget the slipp he could have injured the player badly and would have been out for months, The referee deemed it bad enough for a red card and after VAR review it stayed with the on-field referee choice.

Just like the fudging of the £75 million in the PSR with Covid-19 and the Glazers sale share fees to Jim, It was cleared by the panel and nothing was wrong because it involved United
Click to expand...
It rotates, but never gets divulged. If a club appeals, it always goes to a panel.

The rest is your opinion, which you’re entitled to.
 
thismeansfour said:
Well firstly can you think of many City straight red cards? Rodri last year - clear red. Casemiro actually done a similar incident and got the same treatment. Cancelo against Fulham? Last man with no attempt to play the ball. Firstly look at our straight reds and decide if any should have been overturned. I can't think of any, which is why the club haven't appealed any. We are all screaming bias for it being overturned, whilst missing he was wrongly sent off and both a referee and VAR got it wrong? It is a very backwards way to be corrupt if you ask me. Every club can appeal red card if they want to, do they still get an extra game if it is decided the correct decision was made? Unsure but that is probably why not many appeal. Oh, Calvert Lewin got one overturned last year. Wonder what his United links are
Click to expand...
Why is a panel of 3 right and a ref, 2 linesmen, a video assistant referee and his assistant wrong ?
5 people judged that to be a sending off.
I also wonder why (I've read the media page, you went to Bills funeral) you are so determined to prove the panel were correct.
(Especially as you consider last seasons penalty soft and shouldn't have been given.)
There are only 3 posters I can think of who are so cantankerous and argumentative as you. What was your original user name, you never told us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top