Enjoy :-)
This is where its all fucked up.Almost definitely not. They’ve overturned it because the rags appealed. You’d need a club to request a player of another to be given a retrospective ban presumably and the answer would be ‘no. The ref and var made their decision’
This is what I am getting at, surely if the Rags can successfully appeal an on field decision that is backed up by VAR, it then must open up the possibility of Palace in this instance appealing the decision not to award a red. And seek a retrospective Red card.Are they going to pass it on to the argie dwarf for his two footed jump tackle that injured a Palace player ??
Clear & Obvious.
This is where its all fucked up.
There seems a clear split of opinion on this with people on both sides of the fence of if this should have been a sending off or not.
They have set a mad precident where the Ref makes a call, it is reviewed by VAR and upheld and then the PL overturn the decision.
There is no method in the madness.
Manchester CC licensing compared to Trafford BC licensingOften wonder what the capacity of the swamp would be if the seats had the same leg room as at the Etihad
....a penalty awarded after the final whistle and when some players had left the pitch !!Well it was a rag player that was involved, so that would be the reason aspect resolved.
The powers that be have simply proved that their own system is seriously fucking flawed after hyping the benefits of VAR intervention.
Oh and the game is fucked in order to help the sinking ship , which is actually beyond help, a fault of their own making!
Manchester CC licensing compared to Trafford BC licensing