jimharri
Moderator
And the single win (vs Copenhagen at the fake Old Trafford) was thanks to a last minute penalty save.
But don't forget; "The World's Greatest Club"™, right.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
United Thread | 2024/25
- Thread starter Thaksinssoldier
- Start date
And the single win (vs Copenhagen at the fake Old Trafford) was thanks to a last minute penalty save.
But don't forget; "The World's Greatest Club"™, right.
jimharri
Moderator
If he's not allowed to eat when they're losing, he'll starve!
jimharri
Moderator
That has to be a Bert, shirley?
Why would the PL investigate historic false accounting at united when they're actually aiding and abetting united to flout current FFP/PSR rules to the tune of almost £80m?He sold them down the river. Him, Charlton and Edward’s. If we are being investigated for false accounts, they should go back and check the rags, they will be full of skeletons.
Last edited:
If he's such a wonderful socialist as he and the sycophantic media claim, you'd think he'd forgoe that £2m a year that he doesn't need anyway and do the gig for free, on the basis that the money is used to save many of the backroom jobs that Scruffy Jim slashed.£2m a year for advice like that……
Exactly.We all knew this was going to happen - the rags abiding by the same rules as every other club? Not a chance.
We've seen this with every single game that poisonous club have played, since Sly Sports, the Premier league, and Gill and the Pisscan formed their vile alliance. Anyone seriously thinking the rags have not received preferential treatment since the demise of the old first division is seriously deluded. Look back at the highlights of any game involving the vermin and see how often their fouls have 'not been seen,' or how often opponents have goals disallowed for no logical reason, or the breathtaking amount of penalties they have benefitted from in all those years.
Corruption, in one form or another, has been rampant among the hierarchy of the Premier league since the late 80's/early 90's. It has been a part of our game for so long we hardly notice it nowadays. Sure, there were incidents like George Graham's infamous 'bungs,' and Fat Sam being caught on film etc, but far worse activities have been going on at the swamp on a daily basis that the club itself is synonymous with the word 'corruption.' From the Pisscan's son being the only agent allowed to represent the players, the 99 unanswered questions after the Rock of Gibraltar affair,
the disgustingly biased refereeing that we've all seen over the years, the highly suspicious betting syndicates from the far east always seemed to involve rag matches, and the fact that uber-çunt Ratboy has been given a platform to air his views on, and publicly attack the club owners live on air, and effectively encourage fans to revolt against the so-called tyranny of the Glazer family via Sly Sports should be sufficient reason for questions to start being asked.
This red card being rescinded is just another in a long line of questionable decisions being made (behind closed doors) that greatly benefit one club and leave the others seething with the injustice of it all.
Whenever I refer to corruption, bias and favouritism as far as the rags and the governing bodies are concerned I'm not literally referring to brown envelopes stuffed full of cash changing hands.
It's a deep seated, institutional corruption that's much more insidious and covert than that.
Sk@mcfc
Well-Known Member
That has to be a Bert, shirley?
Possibly but he could also be a deluded rag
Last edited:
Gray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 May 2004
- Messages
- 25,736
- Team supported
- ABU & The Bus Wreckers
Dropped his gong on his foot?Strained a couple of sweat pores, he’ll be out for a couple of weeks. Mostly in Belfast.
To anyone that doesnt believe in corruption i ask one simple question , why are the var conversations hidden from the general public, there is no technological or ethical reason to do so but the pl still treat the fans like idiots who dont understand football. Its no coincidence that var benefits certain clubs far more than it does others and its also no coincidence that they keep the conversations and decision making process secret from the fans.Exactly.
Whenever I refer to corruption, bias and favouritism as far as the rags and the governing bodies are concerned I'm not literally referring to brown envelopes stuffed full of cash changing hands.
It's a deep seated, institutional corruption that's much more insidious and covert than that.
Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
This is what the silly rag bastards dont get. They think the fan base will last forever but the fact is, kids today dont care that united used to be good, my youngest 2 (12 and 9) actually didnt even know they used to be good!Ultimately their fanbase will shrink in the long-haul if they continue down this trajectory. You can only live off the past so long. They are the Blackberry of football on current trajectory.
When i was at school and uniteds trajectory was on the rise every kid who either wasnt into to football initially or didnt have a dad or whatever to push them to support a certain team chose united.
Now its about turn.
They choose city.
I can think of A LOT of examples (through kids school mates and coaching u10s so i fair example) of kids whos dads arent into football or dads are not from round here choosing city. But none united