United Thread | 2024/25

From the BBC

The visitors also failed to avoid another injury issue, as manager Erik ten Hag had hoped, as Brazilian wide-man Antony was stretchered off when he landed awkwardly after attempting an unnecessary flick by the touchline.

Ycnmiu and they are actually 57th in Europe not 21st.

So he injured himself showboating lol
 
MOTM last night was that Kirklees guy, he really does rival some of the shocking forwards we had in our dark days.

It's almost like he entered a compy on the telly by text to play for them.
 
You have to say the Glazers have pulled a masterstroke with what they've done to the rags. Bought them without actually buying them, thereby landing the club with a monumental debt they will never be able to pay: bringing in 25%Jim to take all the flak, and all the time paying themselves a wage packet Elon Musk could only dream about.

The Glazers couldn't care less about what goes on the pitch, they have no real interest in achieving what is best for the club, and they certainly couldn't give a fuck who's managing the team on a day-to-day basis just as long as the money continues to 'pour' in (waterfalls, get it? I know, I'm such a witty old chap!).

Face it, raggies - the one club you hoped and prayed would never be King of the castle is us. You would have preferred Arsenal, Everton, Chelsea - even the dippers - to knock you off your perch: anyone but *us.




* Manchester City FC. The ONLY professional football club in Manchester. A club consistently breaking records and winning awards, a club whose academy is the envy of the world, a club whose one-touch football has been described by some as 'art, truly mesmerising art.'
But worry not, you fickle çunts, our manager won't be going around hurling insults at you at every given chance, we won't be erecting a huge poster at the Etihad proudly informing the world how long it is since you last won a major trophy, because another thing we have which you do not (and never have had) is class.
 
You have to say the Glazers have pulled a masterstroke with what they've done to the rags. Bought them without actually buying them, thereby landing the club with a monumental debt they will never be able to pay: bringing in 25%Jim to take all the flak, and all the time paying themselves a wage packet Elon Musk could only dream about.

The Glazers couldn't care less about what goes on the pitch, they have no real interest in achieving what is best for the club, and they certainly couldn't give a fuck who's managing the team on a day-to-day basis just as long as the money continues to 'pour' in (waterfalls, get it? I know, I'm such a witty old chap!).

Face it, raggies - the one club you hoped and prayed would never be King of the castle is us. You would have preferred Arsenal, Everton, Chelsea - even the dippers - to knock you off your perch: anyone but *us.




* Manchester City FC. The ONLY professional football club in Manchester. A club consistently breaking records and winning awards, a club whose academy is the envy of the world, a club whose one-touch football has been described by some as 'art, truly mesmerising art.'
But worry not, you fickle çunts, our manager won't be going around hurling insults at you at every given chance, we won't be erecting a huge poster at the Etihad proudly informing the world how long it is since you last won a major trophy, because another thing we have which you do not (and never have had) is class.

I agree with the last paragraph. I had a manc rag arguing on YouTube when I posted the same. He argued that Trafford is in Manchester as much as Didsbury is. I kept saying Trafford is in Greater Manchester, Didsbury is in Manchester.
In the end he got me confused !
 
A couple of Rags warming to the idea of Roberto Mancini... This could be interesting!


Just reading that and seen one of their main problems highlighted in a post:

IMG_8085.jpeg

Why are they so obsessed with having their ex-players as coaches or on the coaching staff? Did they learn nothing from Liverpool through the 90s?

There’s no reason why a club should employ someone as a coach just because he played for them and was a fans favourite or one of their best players. Just because it worked for Pep or Ancelotti doesn’t mean that it’s the norm.
 
Just reading that and seen one of their main problems highlighted in a post:

View attachment 136141

Why are they so obsessed with having their ex-players as coaches or on the coaching staff? Did they learn nothing from Liverpool through the 90s?

There’s no reason why a club should employ someone as a coach just because he played for them and was a fans favourite or one of their best players. Just because it worked for Pep or Ancelotti doesn’t mean that it’s the norm.

Bryan Robson-Barman
Steve Bruce-Pieman
Remi Moses-Drugman
Wio Ferdinand-Windowman

Jobs for everyone.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.