United Thread | 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quite looking forward to nipping down the Catalonian local on Wednesday, plonking myself at the end of the bar and watching the numerous half kit wanker southern know nowts faces as the Arse rack up the goals. Better had do anyway - anything for a bit of joy after the past 3 weeks.
 
They are 100% going to win on the 15th and the wank fest will be off the roof, it will calm down when end of season we are at least 10 points and 5 places above them in the final league table.
 
United are flying very close to the sun, as we saw with the 200m lost revenue from Covid. This meant that they couldn't balance their books for that period, and the Glazers panicked and started trying to find investment.

In stepped INEOS, a company that has a track record for asset stripping and running businesses more efficiently, with less overheads. They will upset more people over the next couple of years. But when you have half a billion coming in every year, there is quite a lot of wiggle room. Any half decent businessman could make that work. Which only shows how inept and badly run that club has been for 20 years.

City are doing things the right way, and could probably operate as a stand alone club without ADUG, but this was only possible after a long period of success, following investment.

12 months ago, Qatar were in for United. And as Saudi Arabia already have Newcastle, it could have ended up a monumental pissing contest, with the middle east making a mockery of the premier league. And without some form of regulation, Saudi Arabia would win hands down. They have more money and more influence. They would be out of sight, with everybody else scrapping for a champions league spot. Many clubs supporters would argue that this has already happened, but it would have been a lot worse.

Imagine a world where Vinicius junior signs for Newcastle, for 250m!

I personally think that there should be a cap on signings, and the 12.2 billion that the PL makes from commercial and TV revenue, needs to be distributed much more around the clubs in the league. Then we wouldn't be in a situation where clubs are getting in debt and fans are being fleeced. There is enough money in the pot for everybody to exist financially.
Desperate cunts.
 
Desperate cunts.
I love the way the media cover these rag stories.
Because this is a negative article about the rags, it states the owners are the Glazers and scruffy Jim is a minority owner.
When it's a positive article, only scruffy is mentioned and given the title, owner.

Wankers.
 
Last edited:
I love the way the media cover these rag stories.
Because this is a negative article about the rags, it states the owners are the Glazers and scruffy Jim is a minority owner.
When it's a positive article, only scruffy is mentioned and given
the title owner.

Wankers.

" Media " translated into more accurate description(s) language becomes " whores and shills "

A noble profession............................not !
 
I have just witnessed yet another example of shite and inaccurate " journalism " from the daily mirror.

It criticises Pep for his " arrogance" and " petulant response to the anfield crowd" yesterday.

Not that I necessarily agree but can accept it as an opinion.

Hoever, the arsewipe writing the piece went on to compare the sporting way in which the Govan Bully accepted defeat, despite how painful that might have been , seeing as he was managing the biggest club in the world.

The pathetic **** who composed that utter shite, should be fucking ridiculed and exposed together with the editor of the worst and most inaccurate element of an article in history of misrepresentation of truth.

The Govan Bully being help up as a paragon of sporting behaviour is beyond honesty and objectivity on any known scale, and only a sycophant and idiot would ever claim that to be true.
 
Last edited:
I have just witnessed yet another example of shite and inaccurate " journalism " from the daily mirror.

It criticises Pep for his " arrogance" and " petulant response to the anfield crowd" yesterday.

Not that I necessarily agree but can accept it as an opinion.

Hoever, the arsewipe writing the piece went on to compare the sporting way in which the Govan Bully accepted defeat, despite how painful that might have been , seeing as he was managing the biggest club in the world.

The pathetic **** who composed that utter shite, should be fucking ridiculed and exposed together with the editor of the worst and most inaccurate element of an article in history of misrepresentation of truth.

The Govan Bully being help up as a paragon of sporting behaviour is beyond honesty and objectivity on any known scale, and only a sycophant and idiot would ever claim that to be true.
Unbelievable. Who could write such unadulterated garbage?
He (or she) needs exposing.
 
Good God, the Piss Can was as ungracious a loser as any man in history. In all truth, he's a pretty unpleasant individual all around.

Busby was a gentleman by comparison. You never heard him whine when City beat them.

Holding up the GPC as an example of graciousness is mind-blowing. Like praising Mike Tyson for his ballet skills.
 
Good God, the Piss Can was as ungracious a loser as any man in history. In all truth, he's a pretty unpleasant individual all around.

Busby was a gentleman by comparison. You never heard him whine when City beat them.

Holding up the GPC as an example of graciousness is mind-blowing. Like praising Mike Tyson for his ballet skills.
The young sheep will just lap up whatever they're told happened.

Some of the older ones won't remember/look through red glasses etc.

Imagine what it'll be like when he croaks it. I'm really hoping I'm on a plane to a14 day holiday abroad when that happens.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top