United Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
The only reason Amorim is still in a job in my opinion is because Ratcliffe doesn't want to be proven wrong yet again that he is struggling to manage that club. It's pure sabotage and arrogance.

Any club would have got rid by now. He is statistically the worst manager they have ever had in the PL.

57 points from 46 games is atrocious.
 
The men in white coats will giving him a visit shortly. Apparently it's the Glazers fault that Dalot is taking the long throws. His anti Glineos agenda is off the scale.
I don’t begrudge him what he’s doing.

Rinsing idiot rags of their hard-earned is hilarious in my view.

Good luck to him. I only wish I’d thought about doing it.
 
Still behind Four In À Row and the Treble.
And we’re still waiting for someone to win the domestic treble because winning that was impossible according to some now insignificant OAP.

That 2019 achievement on its own would be lauded high and low if one of the red tops had managed it. The silence is it’s almost as though it never happened. Obviously what went on last century is far more relevant to people today.
 
Wonder how Neville will spin this one out ????
The 4-4 against Bournemouth and the 4-1 beating of Wolves had them getting all giddy about how exciting it was.
The 1-0 win aluded to that they where solid

And now a 1-1 draw against easily one of the poorest sides in PL history so whats the angle on this one.

They have a odd few game spell where they look OK before the real United return
Even the games they've won against Wolves & Newcastle, they were crap
 
There is literally no-one in their squad yesterday that you’d want at City, other than (some say) Fernandes.

But in reality (for the some) we’d not be signing a 31 year old playmaker ever anyway.

The only reason would be to replicate the typical United tactic of the 90’s/00’s - sign the best players from your rivals, to weaken them - berbatov, cantona, tevez, wio, vds, carrick et al
Why would you want sign him because he doesnt work off the ball & can he break down a 10 man low block as Ive only ever seen him perform in a counter attacking team
 
There is literally no-one in their squad yesterday that you’d want at City, other than (some say) Fernandes.

But in reality (for the some) we’d not be signing a 31 year old playmaker ever anyway.

The only reason would be to replicate the typical United tactic of the 90’s/00’s - sign the best players from your rivals, to weaken them - berbatov, cantona, tevez, wio, vds, carrick et al
The rags are not our rivals.
 
You invest in stuff, in the hope/knowledge that it will increase in value.

Scruffy investment has just pushed the (known) debt up to 1b.
The stadium is a death trap, on (steep drop offs to concrete/advertising) and off the field (leaking, concrete rot, rats, scaffolding). With no signs of investment other than another massive public handout request.
The players baring Fernandes and anyone chucked in at the deepend from the poor academy, are just going through the motions picking up a massive wage.
The academy shows for the 33rd year in a row no sign of producing a singular player of a level equal to one of the ‘92, other than in the media (Rashford, januzaj, Mainoo et al).

I really can’t see how investing in United is in anyway a way to increase your money.
Any investment can only be either vanity or rank stupidity.

Cheers Ferguson/RofG, what a marvellous thing you did, and no-one realised it, at the time!
I don’t know which would be the worst place to invest your money in football - the rags or their bastard offspring up in Moston! Both utterly skint and an irrelevance
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top