US & Israel attack Iran

You're British?
You live in Dubai to avoid UK tax?
You're under attack because of the US and Israel?
WTF should my tax pay to help you?
People go out there to provide education as well as "avoid tax", I know several in the region, if a couple of our fighter jets (and it won't be squadrons) prevent missiles being fired at civilians (some of them British) I don't mind personally.
 
People go out there to provide education as well as "avoid tax", I know several in the region, if a couple of our fighter jets (and it won't be squadrons) prevent missiles being fired at civilians (some of them British) I don't mind personally.
We also have many military people and assets across the region, and if we need to keep them safe, we do so.
 
Fairly sure @SWP's back is in that region or at least was and has a lot of friends there.

Tell him.

Tell him he should die because people want to look good on the internet.

Cretins.


And? I can't say that I always agree with him, but he seems decent enough. I'd rather he didn't die, if that helps?


I'll save my concern for the innocents who die to protect the pedo President and the genocidal ****, Netanyahu.
 
UK has accepted US request to use its military bases, Starmer says

Wanker.
This is all peanuts mate, we are totally irrelevant for Americans in this bullshit, even Israel is, if they really want to go the whole month bombing Iran. That's even too long for Israelis, but Americans can do it easy-peasy, they have logistical and operational capabilities for that.

My issue is when China decide to do the same thing with Taiwan, not even an attack, just blockade. Americans know even today the whole Pacific fleet won't be enough and then they will turn to "the coalition of willing" where we are for some stupid reason always No.1. And it won't be "if you want to join us", it will be we want you to join us. What the feck are we going to do then????
 
And? I can't say that I always agree with him, but he seems decent enough. I'd rather he didn't die, if that helps?


I'll save my concern for the innocents who die to protect the pedo President and the genocidal ****, Netanyahu.

What I'm trying to say, and admittedly I should have quoted your quote rather than you, is that the "THEY DON'T PAY TAX SO FUCK THEM", people are slightly mental and humanising/personalising it to someone they know might have made them understand how stupid the idea that we should abandon British people abroad i. Again, just a bad quote tbh, it wasn't directed at you.
 
We also have many military people and assets across the region, and if we need to keep them safe, we do so.
I know, I was trying to focus on those who are working in the region.

We have military in quite a few areas, UAE, Qatar, Oman, Iraq, and Bahrain, possibly even Kuwait (we certainly did have until recently). Unfortunately it may also open up our bases in Cyprus to attack, but they should be easier to defend locally

Not to mention government people at embassies etc.

So if we can use our locally available assets to stop them being at risk from missile launch sites, then I'm fine with that.
 
I know, I was trying to focus on those who are working in the region.

We have military in quite a few areas, UAE, Qatar, Oman, Iraq, and Bahrain, possibly even Kuwait (we certainly did have until recently). Unfortunately it may also open up our bases in Cyprus to attack, but they should be easier to defend locally

Not to mention government people at embassies etc.

So if we can use our locally available assets to stop them being at risk from missile launch sites, then I'm fine with that.
The Iranians will target Cyprus hugely before boots on the ground as a ton of US int agencies have region bases there. Reason they call it the unsinkable aircraft carrier of the Middle East, and major powers have been fighting over it since the 1300s
 
The Iranians will target Cyprus hugely before boots on the ground as a ton of US int agencies have region bases there. Reason they call it the unsinkable aircraft carrier of the Middle East, and major powers have been fighting over it since the 1300s
I was thinking of booking Cyprus for June. Maybe not then.
 
Amazingly the said the Vietnamese and taliban couldn’t go toe to toe either, sadly thousands died in been proved wrong.
Militarily the US/NATO wiped the floor with the Vietnamese and Taliban. The problem with these wars is that the locals only have to outlast the foreign army. They're not going anywhere and they have the easier supply of men, materiel etc. Meanwhile the war becomes politically impossible overseas as more soldiers die and the costs accelerate.

That's the basic reason so many of these wars fail to achieve their aims and the European empires collapsed. Unfortunately nobody ever learns.
 
The Iranians will target Cyprus hugely before boots on the ground as a ton of US int agencies have region bases there. Reason they call it the unsinkable aircraft carrier of the Middle East, and major powers have been fighting over it since the 1300s
And that’s why we’re there, still defending the line. It’s a strategic staging post and one that was vital to support our own troops in the Middle East.
 
I think comparisons with Iraq are largely unhelpful.

This regime will prove more obstinate and difficult to remove than Sadam Hussain.

And Iran has far more potential as a nation. These religious cunts have definitely held it back. Look what’s happened in Dubai since 1979.

Not saying that Dubai is or isn’t grotesque, but it certainly shows how an open Iran could have prospered. If they’d simply stopped being cunts.

Where has this nasty, snide shit actually fucking got them?

Glad the **** is dead, personally.
 
There isn't going to be any "boots on the ground" in Iran, unless they come from the Gulf states being attacked, and I doubt that is even likely.
There's 0% of the stated goal of regime change without boots on the ground imo. Depends how things develop.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top